rbt
Senior Member
Probably a change from 7 & 8 to platform 4 only, but didn't fully edit platform list.
|
|
|
You muggles wouldn't understand
It would be for eastbound movements.is it really that inconvenient to have one of the front end engineers walk down and manually open between coach 10 and the accessibility coach?
Very true, good point. I guess it would necessitate the CSA doing it eastbound, adding dwell time to the schedule.It would be for eastbound movements.
Wouldn't the easiest, least-resistance solution be to just block access to the half of the platform that doesn't open? No idea why ML wouldn't do this.I know it's a common and reoccurring problem, but I was surprised how many people (at least 5) got caught by the door closures at Guelph Central GO. Two of the doors on 12-car trains are hanging off the west end of the platform, but they're not opening doors west of the accessibility coach.
They should have included a 12-car extension in the 2nd platform contract, but that aside, is it really that inconvenient to have one of the front end engineers walk down and manually open between coach 10 and the accessibility coach?
The CSA can’t do it either, because they need to deploy the ramp at the raised platform for people to get on/off.CSA doing it eastbound
This is funny, but somewhat not too surprising considering some Kitchener line trains actually become Barrie line ones after arriving at Union. Regardless, this departure board makes no sense being here at Bramalea.Spotted Barrie Line departure board at Bramalea
Possibility of a 413, CPKC freight bypass?