For what it's worth, I took this test on the Star website last week that concluded I was Heritage Right. I consider myself center-left, I've spent the last five years here offended by the very idea of idiot criminal Rob Ford as Mayor, so this shocked me.
It said I was Heritage Right as well. The survey is:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/11/29/what_kind_of_torontonian_are_you.html
I'm not sure it's working properly ..., or it's not analyzing the rational behind the response to some of the questions.
For example:
Ideology - Propositions used in the calculation of this index:
You slightly agree that the effects of climate change are exaggerated.
You slightly disagree that the next generation will be much worse off because of our treatment of the environment.
You somewhat agree that human beings are largely responsible for global warming
- See more at:
http://sentimeter.thestar.com/#/results/9fcc15d0-1cb0-4fff-90d0-e1f8d2a5115c
Do I believe in Global Warming. Yes. Do I think we've got our heads our our asses? Yes. Should we do something? Yes. Is it going to get worse? Yes.
However, I do slightly agree that the effects are exaggerated. I don't think the next generation (generation being only 20 years) will be
Much worse off. And I only somwhat agree that human being are largely responsible for global warming. Global warming has been going on for 20,000 years. While we are certainly very responsible for the recent acceleration, we certainly aren't
largely responsible that has been going strong for 20,000 years!
Hmm, looks like I got messed up on a double negative .. "You strongly disagree that women who dress provocatively are not at all responsible for any unwanted attention they receive" ... oops, got that backwards!
Going through the other categories, the only other one that I'm anywhere close to Heritage Right is on Unions:
Propositions used in the calculation of this index:
You slightly disagree that unions are as necessary now as they were a century ago.
You somewhat disagree that the selfishness of employers can be fought only by strong unions.
You slightly agree that unions too often protect members who should rightfully be fired.
I think unions are necessary. I think they should be strong. But by slightly agreeing that they are as not as necessary as they were a century ago (before we had much in the way of labour laws), and that employers can
Only be fought by strong unions (the very existence of a court system and labour laws means everyone should disagree with that one) puts me right on Heritage Right? Fail.
Edit - went through again, changing that response on dressing provocatively from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and I'm still Hertitage Right. I think it's simply broken. Though it does say I'm least like steadfast right ...