Well, since the rightist stance is that society's not to get involved with any tax dollars regarding human help, I suppose that eliminates any public shelters and supports. So - since charity begins at home, I think it must start with the the supporters of extreme economic individuality (and yes, online posters) taking the homeless into their stately yards and basements as unique human-like pets or charitable tax write-offs. A manufacturer of small backyard sheds and leashes - or basement cells - could make a mint.
That solution won't be for everyone, since many realistic city people can't all afford a multi-room home with soundproofing. Many might still want to participate in reporting the homeless to the police through convenient apps and websites - getting a 'gold star' award online that would look good on a resume - or simply for bragging rights. Making intermittent charitable and corporate donations could also be put to work helping one's social status.
Herding the indigent out to camps on the corporate dollar - to work 'difficult' and 'awkward' labour, with overtime to work off their transtion cost, of course - would be nice. The kind hearted might want to 'adopt-a-rubbie', and recieve handwritten letters on holidays, as well as updates on how well their powerless beneficiary is doing. The children will love sending holiday treats!
Urban work centres could easily be located in existing remote brownfields and second-hand corporate parks. So long as they are impassably secured and kept from sight, they would provide a unique pool of labour at hand, without the burden of transport. Having the labourers beautify the borders of their own property (on their off hours) would be a pleasant civic virtue. Picturesque elements, like moats stocked with alligators, could even be an attraction for children.
Hospitals are always looking for trial subjects. That, or the shell-shocked, incorrigible, infirm and fairly willing to die could be made into glue, lampshades and unique local tchotkes.
Since people's hearts are not made of stone, programs would be in place by which a family can buy out a good, reformed capture and take him on as a servant. Others, more well off and posessed of superhuman graciousness, may choose to simply buy the freedom of those who have proven themselves redeemed.
Others may want to look at the 'build your very own friendly helper' program - for themselves, or as a contribution to finance. This starts with an individual's past profile and builds on it with selections from a range of assistive corporal punishments, electroconvulsive and surgical therapies, and pharmaceutical steerings (all via corporate testing). These, in combination with varying levels of solitary and group therapies, variegated work severities and reconditioning, can produce a non-stop worker bee that's as friendly as a bunny.
Since it's a matter of faith that the nuclear family is the primary unit of society - and the only producer of self-control and responsibility - it makes sense that errant families be morally disciplined to the same extent as their laxness regarding their vagrant members. Family members who have let their offspring go bad could be tracked down and charged for upkeep. That would reduce the pressure on the first two solutions and also be a practical way to restore the ties that bind. Legal punitive measures for all based on any new infractions of the one would provide a tidy enforcement of 'self-responsibility' - a quality sadly in decline in today's permissive society.
A tidy profit could be made by entrepeneurs willing to use a computer tracking system to legally enforce family ties and prescribe mandatory legal solutions.
Faith-based organizations offer unique perspectives on treatment and norms for pathologies that have not been fully utilized in Canada to the extent that they have been in the United States. For instance, a restored Christian Women's Temperance Union, or Orange Lodge, could help keep an eye on things with computerized filing on all it's subjects, and door-to-door upkeep. With the eye of the state removed from oversight on how private religious organizations operate and finance themselves, enlightened exploitation of possibilities for universal financial gain would be just around the corner.
If these meagre suggestions were implemented, I'm sure Nathan Phillips square would be cleared in a human heartbeat. Dundas and Sherbourne would blossom like a flower in the wilderness, and Toronto would wear the gleaming crown if civic virtue once again. Now, after that, if we could just do something about the Irish.
