innsertnamehere
Superstar
if the libs aren't in power at that time, it will be the cons. and they will be even less inclined, as it would mean a tax increase. (which they are against)
|
|
|
People might not make two switches, but lots of people would get on the DRL first and then transfer to the Yonge line. If the line goes as far as Eglinton (or even Sheppard), riders in that part of the city would get on the DRL first and not even use the Danforth and Yonge lines. That alone takes a lot of pressure off Bloor-Yonge.I still worry that the DRL may not take away enough riders from the Yonge-Bloor interchange. The only people who will transfer to the DRL from Scarborough are those whose final destination is on the DRL or at the DRL / YUS interchange (King?). No-one will switch to the DRL and switch again to YUS to reach their destination. If a busy enough station is not chosen as the interchange, we may not get enough people switching to the DRL.
I don't see any way the Stouffville line would have an actual third rail subway built along it. The only design that would make sense is regional rail - upgrading the infrastructure that's already there. With the demand provided by Markham Centre, it would be a worthy investment. Sure it would run parallel to the Danforth line more or less, but only for a relatively short distance. It would provide a faster trip catered to longer distances just like the Lakeshore and airport/Kitchener lines will.also, the etobicoke express will basically be the ARL upgraded, probably run by GO having a station every couple of kilometres, probably with 10-15 minute headways. hard to cut, as it is basically upgraded service on an already existing line, and impossible to merge into the DME. the stouffville InRail on the other hand appears to be a fully fledged subway run by the TTC. and is completely useless below sheppard as it just runs parallel to other subway lines.
if the libs aren't in power at that time, it will be the cons. and they will be even less inclined, as it would mean a tax increase. (which they are against)
Very true. This frankly makes Scarborough one of the most covered areas in the GTA.I think it's really quite interesting that, despite all the hand-waving, this seems to boil down to -- OK Scarborough, if you want a subway replacement for the SRT, we'll do that. But you have to pay up for proper transit everywhere else, as well.
Looks like the gauntlet has been thrown down for 2014.
Wasn't it foreseen that surface LRT on Jane south of Wilson would have significant problems with the available right-of-way?
Something I have to ask, being a 905er who loves Toronto:
I'm not crazy to think that Toronto City Council should ask York Region and Durham Region and Brampton and Mississauga to pitch in, right?
An electrified Etobicoke line is exactly what those in Malton and Brampton have been asking for to get rid of diesel trains. Scarborough Express is essentially Markham's I-METRO-E proposal. Extend the Yonge subway to Steeles? Ask York Region for money and we can extend to RHC. Same for the Don Mills LRT. Ellesmere BRT? Well, DRT is launching DRT Pulse on pretty much the same routing. WWLRT? Metrolinx's plan was for it to go to Port Credit, not stop at Long Branch. Would Mississauga pitch in?
I don't know whether they'd be willing to pay, but it'd be worth a try.