DSC
Superstar
Not sure if this has been posted, it's about to start. The concrete structure of this on-ramp looks to be in pretty poor shape.
|
|
|
One only has to look to Boston and Seattle to see what it cost them to put their elevated Hwy underground, how long it took and the problems with it after the fact..Pardon my lack of civil engineering knowledge, but would it have been too cost prohibitive to tunnel for both the Ontario Line and a new hypothetical underground Gardiner rebuild? In my head it would make sense to combine the tunnelling costs of the OL with the costs of the Gardiner rebuild and just go ahead and build a massive multimodal tunnel downtown. But hey, what do I know.
I've talked about this before. The issue with LSW is the lack of parking between Clarkson and Union. People still opt to drive on the Gardiner cause they can't find a parking spot at the GO stations.The province needs to fund higher, alternative GO service in order to ratchet back on the gridlock.
LSW needs to go to 15 minute all-day service every day, and they need to squeeze in another couple of peak period trains too.
Milton needs to be maxed out based on current infra. which would be about 3 more trains each way, and K-W needs to be pushed to its limits, particularly in the Union-Bramalea segment.
****
To tackle the central/eastern segments, they likewise need to get to 15 minute service, all-day, every day on the LSE and bring back express services......
Which yes, again, I'm going to point out the mess here was caused by failing to insist on burying the Ontario Line through Leslieville.
Likewise, they need to get Stouffville off-peak up to 30M 2-way, all-day.
You can't just accelerate work when that work is still going to be measured in terms of six or more years total. You need alternatives.
The Gardiner removal ship has sailed and with the upload to the province I don't see any movement for a long time. Better focus on what's doable in this context.
AoD
They're probably not going to put a brand new elevated expressway underground (which is what's under construction now). On the other hand, as the maintenance costs increase and the regional transit system gets built out, I could see provincial bureaucrats deeming it to no longer be a necessary piece of infrastructure. The province won't want to deal with the maintenance costs after awhile.
Pardon my lack of civil engineering knowledge, but would it have been too cost prohibitive to tunnel for both the Ontario Line and a new hypothetical underground Gardiner rebuild? In my head it would make sense to combine the tunnelling costs of the OL with the costs of the Gardiner rebuild and just go ahead and build a massive multimodal tunnel downtown. But hey, what do I know.
While downloading assets to municipalities isn't unknown, I don't see it happening after they have uploaded this particular piece - given the importance of this particular set of expressways; and really, the overall maintenance cost is - while substantial - more or less a rounding error in the provincial budget.
AoD
Better developed transit, less traffic, and/or other parallel expressways that weren't jammed to the gills. The last one is often the case in other cities - Detroit's I-375 is less than 2 km away from the M-10, and Syracuse, New York's I-81 can easily be rerouted since a large amount of its drivers aren't even going downtown.My point was that some enlightened provincial bureaucrats might deem the whole thing unnecessary at some point in the future and choose to demolish it. It has happened in many cities already, though usually in places with better developed transit and/or less traffic.
Amazing!!They are building a long 20' high wall mural.