kamira51
Active Member
Is there a collection of easily accessible archived highway plans, studys, etc.
|
|
|
I want to like this but there’s not a single section that I drive on frequently. Why are they doing this so piecemeal?Toronto, Canada and Global Breaking News – CP24
Most recent News News business news stories and video from CP24www.cp24.com
Effective July 11 or as soon as possible after that date.
- Hwy 403 from Brantford to Hamilton
- Hwy 401, Tilbury, extending the existing 110 km/h zone further east by 7 km
- Hwy 401 from Colborne to Belleville
- Hwy 401 from Belleville to Kingston
- Hwy 401 from Hwy 16 to Quebec boundary
- Hwy 406 from Thorold to Welland
- Hwy 416 from Hwy 401 to Ottawa
- Hwy 69 from Sudbury to French River
My understanding is that MTO is making small upgrades to the stretches beforehand - i.e. upgraded guardrails, etc.
I do know the 403 through those stretches was resurfaced last year - I imagine they looped in some minor upgrades with that before increasing the limit.
It's good to see more increases, but I definitely see a lot more room for reasonable stretches to be increased to 110 still:
- 400 Vaughan - Barrie, north of Barrie to MacTier
- 401 Kingston to 416
- 401 London to Kitchener, Cambridge to Milton
- 407 in it's entirety
- 418
- 401 Cobourg to Colborne
- 17 west of Sudbury
- 11 Gravenhurst to Bracebridge
I also think the twinned parts of 11/17 east of Thunder Bay desperately need a limit higher than 90 km/h, be it 100 or 110.
Official news release with mapToronto, Canada and Global Breaking News – CP24
Most recent News News business news stories and video from CP24www.cp24.com
Effective July 11 or as soon as possible after that date.
- Hwy 403 from Brantford to Hamilton
- Hwy 401, Tilbury, extending the existing 110 km/h zone further east by 7 km
- Hwy 401 from Colborne to Belleville
- Hwy 401 from Belleville to Kingston
- Hwy 401 from Hwy 16 to Quebec boundary
- Hwy 406 from Thorold to Welland
- Hwy 416 from Hwy 401 to Ottawa
- Hwy 69 from Sudbury to French River
Hwy 11 between Gravenhurst and Bracebridge has a couple of at-grade intersections, which might a hard stop for the MTO. If memory serves, 17 west of Sudbury and 11/17 east of TBay does as well.My understanding is that MTO is making small upgrades to the stretches beforehand - i.e. upgraded guardrails, etc.
I do know the 403 through those stretches was resurfaced last year - I imagine they looped in some minor upgrades with that before increasing the limit.
It's good to see more increases, but I definitely see a lot more room for reasonable stretches to be increased to 110 still:
- 400 Vaughan - Barrie, north of Barrie to MacTier
- 401 Kingston to 416
- 401 London to Kitchener, Cambridge to Milton
- 407 in it's entirety
- 418
- 401 Cobourg to Colborne
- 17 west of Sudbury
- 11 Gravenhurst to Bracebridge
I also think the twinned parts of 11/17 east of Thunder Bay desperately need a limit higher than 90 km/h, be it 100 or 110.
There are several highways in US and elsewhere with much lower safety standards (narrow right shoulder, no left shoulder, short merging lanes, etc), yet much higher speed limits.The 400 will not get a higher speed limit between Barrie and Toronto for years to come, because of all the construction along the corridor. I would agree with the 401 between Woodstock and Kitchener (Homer Watson), as that is built to the latest standards and has very few exits. Highway 400 north of Barrie is not built to the latest MTO standards. The traffic is light (except cottage country weekends) but it doesn't have the wide shoulders or upgraded guard rails.
A lot of the western US has an 80 (130) limit, even in more mountainous stretches like throughout a lot of the Rockies in Montana. BC even signs the 5 as 120, despite being far windier and with far more elevation change than any major highway in Ontario. Here's an example:There are several highways in US and elsewhere with much lower safety standards (narrow right shoulder, no left shoulder, short merging lanes, etc), yet much higher speed limits.
Even 401 within GTA is good for 120 speed limit. All merging lanes are 300 m long with a few exceptions and there are wide right and left shoulders pretty much everywhere.
Doesn't Ontario have the "safest" roads in the continent? I feel like that reputation is part of why they're so conservativeA lot of the western US has an 80 (130) limit, even in more mountainous stretches like throughout a lot of the Rockies in Montana. BC even signs the 5 as 120, despite being far windier and with far more elevation change than any major highway in Ontario. Here's an example:
View attachment 559279
View attachment 559280
View attachment 559281
Note the absence of any accel/deccel lanes, and narrow inside shoulders.
The speed limit would be staying put not because the road can't accommodate faster speed but the volume is too much to support it during most times of the day. 120 to 130 is possible on 69/400 north of Barrie where traffic is light but it's too fast for busy routes where some don't even drive at 100.There are several highways in US and elsewhere with much lower safety standards (narrow right shoulder, no left shoulder, short merging lanes, etc), yet much higher speed limits.
Even 401 within GTA is good for 120 speed limit. All merging lanes are 300 m long with a few exceptions and there are wide right and left shoulders pretty much everywhere.