News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 5.1K     0 

Status
Not open for further replies.
ChesterCopperpot said:
This isn't The Wire
Click to expand...

If there is a possibly a murder connected to any of this, the shipping of illegal arms, drug trafficking and if Ford could possibly be involved in any of this, certainly a Judge would sign off on whomever the police/OPP/RCMP might consider "people of interest".
 
The pressure in the mayor's office must be growing and intense. I feel for all those twenty-something newbies Rob just hired--can't imagine what a day would be like there.
 
TheTigerMaster said:
Ford should be disgusted with himself. At least 14% of our children admit to being LGBT. What kind of message does this send them?
Click to expand...
14%? Seems rather high. And children of what age?


Just watching CP24, I gotta say Ford's initial reaction to the raids is priceless. ("...get it through your thick skulls...")
 
Blair was just on CP24 as he was heading into the Metro Convention Centre (?). Isn't 1010 up at Yonge & St. Clair?
 
dt_toronto_geek said:
Lost in all the excitement of this morning's raids, "Mayor" Ford + Councillors Del Grande & Shiner voted no, and Councillor Pasternak walked off the floor today re: funding Pride, the Toronto International Film Festival, the Art Gallery of Ontario, and other major cultural organizations.
Click to expand...

coatofarms.jpg


Toronto's Coat of Arms and Motto

The motto: "Diversity Our Strength": This is the motto that describes the city. It refers to the combined strength of seven municipalities.

From Toronto's own website at this link.

From Spacing Toronto, at this link:

LORINC: Diversity at city hall no longer our strength

Question: If Mayor Rob Ford had replaced Jaye Robinson with Frances Nunziata on the executive committee yesterday (note to procedural geeks: I know this isn’t possible), would City Council be any more responsive to women’s issues than it is in its new estrogen-free state?

Answer: Meh.

The story about the mayor’s latest cow patty two-step is not that he’s made his administration even less representative of the diverse interests of 51% of Toronto’s population, although that result seems to be inevitable. Rather, the Fords’ decision to promote Norm Kelly and Anthony Perruzza is merely the latest evidence of the two most pronounced ticks in their idiotic approach to council governance.

The first is that the Fords, for reasons which require no further explanation, fervently believe in what might be called a de-meritocracy: surrounding themselves with the most pliable and under-performing members of council. That the majority seems to be men doesn’t speak so well about the males on council. But the habit is born of a compulsion to boss around that dwindling collection of lackeys who are still willing to do their bidding.

I should pause here to say that Paul Ainslie’s remvoal as chair of the government management committee is a far bigger blow than Jaye Robinson’s dismissal. Despite her arts and government background, Robinson has not been a particularly impressive councillor, and her mystifying, though increasingly contingent, support of the Ford administration’s paleolithic approach to local government has long made me wonder about her integrity.

Ainslie, for his part, is a credible member of the thinking right who has taken some difficult but principled decisions in recent months. I frankly wish there were more like him on council, because the debates would be crisper and more focused on the nuances of policy as opposed to blunt instruments of politics.

As for the newcomers, Perruzza is, by a long shot, the least impressive member of council’s left – a 15-watt bulb who now probably harbours fantasies of wielding influence with the Fordites, even as they plot to knock him off in 2014. Kelly, of course, requires no further comment.

All of which leads me to the second defining feature of the Fordist approach to council politics, which is their remarkable ability to dehumanize those individuals (and constituencies) with whom they have a real or imagined difference of views.

What astonishes about the Fords is not merely their indifference to the women’s vote, such as it is. Rather, it is their ability to convince themselves that all the people in the city with whom they disagree don’t count. That’s what this latest move most vividly reveals, again. The observation is neither newsworthy nor original, but it’s worth repeating: the Fords believe that their supporters must vanquish their opponents on this field of battle known as the floor of council…as opposed to figuring out where the two constituencies’ common interests lie.

I know this will sound like a lecture, but every political leader — as a matter of first principle and regardless of ideology – has a moral obligation to understand how the other half lives, so to speak. That’s what it means when they say they’re the mayor of all the people. It’s not just about dancing with the ones that brung ya.

What’s more, the principle applies to left and right, downtowner and suburbanite, rich and poor, immigrant and indigenous. We share the city in all its urban messiness, and so it behooves those charged with its management to figure out how to make the best of a complex environment rife with diverging interests.

Ideally, council represents an imperfect forum in which those accommodations can be worked out, bit by bit. It is assuredly not a football game.

That the Fords’ treat local government like a football game — fielding a team made up of journeymen and has-beens — is merely another gift to the 65% of Torontonians who would not vote for a toaster oven if it promised to lower taxes.

And if Karen Stintz or Olivia Chow can use the Fords’ latest fumble to pry even more votes away from the Fords, so much the better.

Postscript: On Twitter yesterday, I asked how many Canadian publicly traded companies have boards that include no women.

Here’s one answer: According to a report on the governance of Canada’s 100 largest public companies [PDF], compiled by the head-hunting firm Spencer Stuart, 12% have no female directors, down from 29% in 2000. That year, in turn, 40% of leading corporate boards had two or more women; in 2012, the proportion had risen to 62%. Since 2006, the survey further found, there’s been a “significant increase†in the number of boards with multiple women directors.

That said, only 17% of all directors of these firms are women, compared to a third of Toronto city councillors.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • coatofarms.jpg
    coatofarms.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 371
GenerationW said:
14%? Seems rather high. And children of what age?


Just watching CP24, I gotta say Ford's initial reaction to the raids is priceless. ("...get it through your thick skulls...")
Click to expand...

High school students aged 13 - 18. I was surprised by the number, but the findings are in line with several other studies.

At least three separate studies that I've seen concluded that 12% - 14% of Canadian high school students admit to being LGBT. I'll try to dig up the links to them as a reference. The surveys were done at random schools by handing out questionnaires to all the students in the class. I have yet to see any that have come up with conflicting conclusions.

It's also in line with a study commissioned by the National Post that showed that the younger you are, the more likely you are to identify as LGBT. Only 2% of people 65+ identified as LGBT; this gradually increased to 10% as you got to 20 year old age group. Makes sense that the next youngest age group would be in the 12% - 15% area.

And remember, these numbers only represent people who've admitted to being LGBT. I think it's fair to conclude that there are quite a few who lied given the homophobia that still exists.
 
They raided 15 Windsor today:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2013/06/13/toronto-police-raids.html


edit:

also from the Star:
Toronto Police using surveillance techniques were “investigating the existence” of an alleged crack cocaine video linked to Mayor Rob Ford several weeks before the story first surfaced, CTV News reported Thursday in the wake of a massive multi-city police drugs and guns sweep.

The broadcaster quoted a “highly placed source” as confirming that “persons of interest discussed that video in detail, and referred to the mayor’s alleged presence in the video.”
Click to expand...
http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2013/06/13/massive_police_raid_launched_in_toronto.html
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top