r937
Active Member
he/she probably just wants to turn off email notificationsIf that doesn't work I suggest NOT COMING TO THE SITE ANYMORE
|
|
|
he/she probably just wants to turn off email notificationsIf that doesn't work I suggest NOT COMING TO THE SITE ANYMORE
Is the problem that you're getting emailed every time there's a new post to a thread?How do you get unsubscribed from this site? I've written twice to administration to delete my account.
If that doesn't work I suggest NOT COMING TO THE SITE ANYMORE
Well, he was definitely at City Hall last night. Sit-in saw him arrive around 6 when the building was starting to close up. The lights were still on in his office when I passed by on my way home from work a little after 11.
That wouldn't be enough. They would have to show that he knew that "whatever you think you need" included violent means.
For example:
Lets say I'm at work, and there's a big deadline on friday. I've got to leave for a business trip, so I tell one of my employees "This has to be done by friday, no matter what. You do whatever you need to to make sure this gets done." Then head out the door.
If my employee beats other members of the team with a stick to get them to work faster, I can't reasonably charged because that person took illegal actions in my absence.
There is no reasonable expectation on my part that he's going to do illegal things. The whole society works because in general we expect each other to obey the law. I expected him to work late, to ask people to help, to cancel or delay other less important projects etc. I defintely don't expect him to beat people because that's just not part of what happens in an office.
Things would be different if there was an earlier situation where I had left and he had beat everyone. In that case there would be a history that I knew about. So I would have a reasonable expectation that it could happen again.
Or if the employee asked "Anything? What's that mean?" and I said "Give em a little extra encouragement, and I'm not talking about bonuses." well now it's starting to become plausible that I intended something like the beatings to occur.
So it's not enough for them to have Ford saying "Do whatever you need to get that video back." They would have to show that he was aware of the actions that Sandro was going to take, that he approved of them and was directly involved in the decision to carry them out.
Was Henry II culpable for the death of Thomas Becket?
Well, he was definitely at City Hall last night. Sit-in saw him arrive around 6 when the building was starting to close up. The lights were still on in his office when I passed by on my way home from work a little after 11.
he/she probably just wants to turn off email notifications
Or maybe he took the TT....ah, who am I kidding.Wonder whether his driver showed up. If not, there's a good chance he put the good citizens of Toronto at risk on his drive home. As usual.
It's a little strange that there isn't much talk about this new video on twitter. Is CTV waiting until 6pm to broadcast it? Or maybe the video isn't really anything to shake a stick at.Can't wait for CTV to broadcast their video.
Historically speaking, no. The knights that killed Thomas we're sleep deprived and weren't in their right minds when they killed him at Cantebury. Henry merely asked a rhetorical question.
The Email notifications are rather annoying. My throw away email has at least tens of thousands of emails from UT.