News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hold on now ... Ward 2 is just as entitled to good representation from the city politic as any other group of Tronnians. I'd bet the revival of interest in the Woodbine Live is a deliberate move to shaft the Fords in their own backyard. Rob royally screwed up any possibility that developers would seriously put time & effort into Ward 2 and AFAIK Doug didn't make any effort. Whether or not the Woodbine Live Sequel needs a casino to succeed (and it probably does to attract investment) is part of the issue. But when Rob botched up Woodbine Disaster, he potentially lost thousands of jobs for Ward 2, which has continued to suffer declining local jobs during the Ford era. If Tory can get serious development to happen on the WL soybean field, it will be a very smart move on his part politically for him and it would also be a giant great FU to the Fords. Plus it would benefit one of the 'third city' regions of Toronto - people in Ward 2 are well aware that Mississauga is booming on the other side of Hwy 27.

The whole of Northwest Toronto has undue influence over Council as witnessed by the total number of electors in Wards1,2,3,7,8,9,10,11 and 12 having 314,856 vs say the Old City Wards 19,20,21,22,27,28 with 317,048
It is somewhat difficult to justify 9 wards with a smaller total electorate vs 6 wards...
 
The whole of Northwest Toronto has undue influence over Council as witnessed by the total number of electors in Wards1,2,3,7,8,9,10,11 and 12 having 314,856 vs say the Old City Wards 19,20,21,22,27,28 with 317,048
It is somewhat difficult to justify 9 wards with a smaller total electorate vs 6 wards...

That's 'cause two hard-working regular folk Ford Nationals equal three downtown latte-sipping elitists. Ford Math ya know.
 
So, Worms was praising the HHOF appointment and is now highly critical of them?

http://www.torontosun.com/2015/04/06/why-is-hockey-hall-of-fame-getting-a-break

Turns out Councillor Rob Ford being named to the Hockey Hall of Fame board is not the story.

The average NHL team is worth $490 million and the Toronto Maple Leafs are valued at more than $1 billion. The average NHL player earns $2.4 million but some players make $12 million.

The average NHL hockey ticket is $100. The average Toronto homeowner pays $3,612 in property taxes while the average monthly apartment rental is $1,400.

Meanwhile, the Hockey Hall of Fame pays no property taxes and $1 a year in rent for 50,000 square feet in the heart of downtown. It means the cradle of hockey history and custodian of the Stanley Cup receives what amounts to a subsidy of between $1.5-million and $2-million a year.

Seems the HHOF, which draws 300,000 visitors a year, is a registered charity or a “not for profit cultural institute.”

But it’s not a city department, a city service or housed in a city building so why are Toronto taxpayers subsidizing it?

I set out to find out and had an honest, friendly, enlightening conversion with Hall president Jeff Denomme.

“The Hockey Hall of Fame’s special relationship with the municipal governments in Toronto is entrenched from the development of the Hockey Hall of Fame’s first building at Exhibition Place (on the Canadian National Exhibition grounds owned by the City of Toronto) in 1961 to the city’s progressive assistance and support in the establishment and sustainability of the Hall’s museum premises at Brookfield Place (formerly BCE Place), 1993 to present,” Jeff told me.

Special arrangement describes it — done during Mayor Art Eggleton’s time.

It’s what amounts to a 99-year, rent-free lease that is just 23-years in. After more than 20 years at the CNE, the HHOF was looking for a new home. Montreal and Peterborough were considered but the location at Front and Yonge Sts. was the best deal.

“In the early 1990’s, the developer of BCE Place (later renamed to Brookfield Place), Bell Canada Enterprises, Inc., was required by the City of Toronto to restore the historic Bank of Montreal building on the corner of Front and Yonge Sts., given that it is designated as a heritage property pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act. The Bank of Montreal building is the iconic streetscape façade of the Hockey Hall of Fame and forms a significant part of its exhibition facilities,” said Denomme.

“Specifically, under then Section 36 (now Section37) of the Ontario Planning Act, municipalities can allow developers to increase the height and density of their developments in return for developers providing public services and facilities. In the case of Brookfield Place, the developer received the increases in height and density from the City of Toronto, in exchange for the provision of facilities, one of which was the requirement to lease approximately 50,000 square feet of space rent free, comprising the whole of the Bank of Montreal building and additional space in the shopping concourse.

“The City of Toronto has the legal right to elect up to three directors,” he said.

Current members are Councillor’s Ford, Mark Grimes and Stephen Holyday.

“The positions on the board date back to the CNE days prior to the relocation and expansion to BCE Place,” said Denomme. “All institutional members (including the City of Toronto) are entrenched in HHOF’s bylaws because they are all key stakeholders and contributors to its growth and development.”

But why does the city need them? The city has no equity in the HHOF and there is no profit coming back.

“Correct, no equity as HHOF is a not-for-profit corporation,” explained Denomme, adding however “property tax exemptions on approx 75,000 square feet,” does exist “but no direct annual contributions.”

The arrangement with the city has indeed grown. The HHOF in 2012 took on 18,000 square feet of rental space at Etobicoke’s Mastercard Centre for its resource centre and archives. Denomme said while the Hall does pay “favourable market rent,” it does qualify “for an exemption from property taxes which is essential to the Hall’s on-going economic viability.”

The questions may not be on why Ford is on the board as much as why any city councillor receives an appointment and how much revenue is being lost?

I love the HHOF which has been a tremendous resource with its excellent staff. But why, in a city where seniors have been evicted out of their TCHC apartments, are Toronto taxpayers subsidizing the rich hockey industry?

Could a city struggling to make budget ask the multi-billion-dollar NHL to chip in a little more to help out?
 
Last edited:
I just came across this, how did you guys miss the best Rob Ford headline of the year?!

Frankly I'm so sick of this story all over twitter. Lots of foreign media musing over the appointment because they don't know how the process works -- that a bunch of city councillors get appointed to a bunch of boards and committees all the time. It's a totally meaningless appointment and there are other 'shady' councillors getting them (Mammo, as mentioned), and the HHOF don't really have any say in it anyways, and he has no power there anyways.

People are all outraged and even sending angry tweets to the HHOF, threatening to boycott them or whatever. :rolleyes: Some might think any bad press surrounding RoFo is good, but I think the same people couldn't be bothered to get mad about more serious things he did that they should be mad about because it affects people's lives. This just contributes to him being martyred ("their ganging up on poor, cancerous Robbie again!") and to a kind of "Rob Ford outrage fatigue" that leads to people just tuning out, not wanting to hear about it anymore -- even when the next outrage is something people actually should get riled up about.
 
What's "hockey"?
 
That rambling mass of words from Joe is just retaliation for the HHOF distancing themselves from Rob's appointment.
 
What's "hockey"?

It's an evil construct by athletic "millionaires" to cheat hard-working "taxpayers" from their already meagre existence.

Unless you own season tickets... then it's fucking awesome.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top