News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.8K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5K     0 

Happens all the time. The top ranking executives get the big, big severance packages while the low ranking get either the legal minimum or "breadcrumbs".
 
What a debacle. I know through a few degrees of separation some upper level execs who got poached from their previous positions at competing retailers when Target came into town. A lot of competitors were fearing not just increased competition with the arrival of Target, but possibility of losing good employees...and they did just that. Fast forward to today and the water cooler sentiment is that most of those high level executives will not be welcomed back with open arms at their previous employers.
 
I was in Target on the weekend. It seemed busier than usual. Lots of bare shelves, they won't have a lot left over for the store closing sale.
 
Ugly. I can't even imagine the low morale of the employees that do show up for work, dealing with the hordes of bargain hunters, knowing all well that they will be out of their very job in a short while.
 
Target is not doing this with a lot of class. Store employees are effectively getting very little severance, pharmacy franchisees are being cast adrift, and executives are being given large pay-outs for having overseen this debacle.
 
Target is not doing this with a lot of class. Store employees are effectively getting very little severance, pharmacy franchisees are being cast adrift, and executives are being given large pay-outs for having overseen this debacle.

Nope, in fact the hasty withdrawl make it look even worse than the general incompetence thus far. Perhaps a few of the said to be unemployed need to get on Oprah to talk about Tarjeh.

Bullseye is leaving, and guess what parting gift was on the floor?

AoD
 
The check-out line ran around 3/4 of the perimeter aisle of the store. Wait time about 30 minutes before reaching a cashier. Have a second person to hold your place (alternating) in line. Line moves okay.

While the signs say "up to 30%" it is the "up to" to be considered. Most items are 10%, but there are already empty shelves.
 
I don't understand why people would be expecting to just walk in and have everything 90% off. As with any bankruptcy, they try and get the most they can for everything. What doesn't sell at 10% off will later be reduced to 20%, then 30%, and so on.
 
Liquidation sales are almost always crappy. The Consumerist writes about them often -- liquidators often start by jacking up prices to MSRP, and start with discounts that are not much different than everyday sales (and sometimes still higher than the prices offered by competitors for similar or same merchandise). The modus operandi of typical liquidation sales is not unique to Target. When Linen'N'Things went bankrupt, their liquidation sale was notorious for offering terrible bargains. The fact that liquidators draw in consumers at the beginning with promises of 30% off, when very few products have been discounted that much (and some products are almost always priced higher than they have been in the recent past), rightfully makes consumers mad, but again that is common practice and not unique to Target.

Having said that, Canadians are not being unreasonable when they say that the whole Target experience in this country has been crappy. And the fact that Target's liquidation sale is also crappy, while not being an unusual circumstance, is just icing on the cake, and it's not unreasonable to make Target wear that as well. Target's liquidation sale is as disappointing as everything else it did in this country, and they are as much to blame for this craptastic ending as they are for everything else. There is only one party to blame for the fact that Target stores in Canada are today plastered in tacky yellow signs, staffed by demoralized workers and full of disappointed customers -- and that's Target.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top