[MacLac]

The "unhoused" are like feral dogs...they piss in their territory's corners to mark their spot....OR they are paying homage to one of their kin that was cooking up their a few years ago and caught himself on fire.....fire went out and then not too long afterwards he caught on fire AGAIN - the 2nd fire did him in right and proper though....

 

[MacLac]

View attachment 717916

Ian, keep your HOES away or else....lol. Is the hotel still open for business?

 

[Edmcowboy11]

I so wish something good can go in there at street level and create enough foot traffic that it will push any problems out of the area.

 

[David A]

I so wish something good can go in there at street level and create enough foot traffic that it will push any problems out of the area.

Its too bad the hotel is nice newer building, but we need more than one in this area and certainly something at street level to create more foot traffic.

 

[TAS]

Motion today from Tang.

Regarding #2, apparently the city believes that Qualico owns the 97st bridge and Qualico says it's the city. Interesting, ha

Good motion though.

 

[kcantor]

^
I’m not sure how you draw either of your conclusions regarding ownership of the bridge from reading #2?

 

[TAS]

^
I’m not sure how you draw either of your conclusions regarding ownership of the bridge from reading #2?

Sorry for confusion. It was brought up in the discussion when Tang was asking admin a question about the bridge.

Tang to admin: "Does Qualico own the bridge?"

Admin: "Our position is Qualico owns the bridge. It is not Qualico's position."

Tang: "I think it's very important that we're clear on that."

Admin said the city has provided CRL money to Qualico/Stationlands specifically to do something with bridge, not neccessarily to tear it down, but do something. They have until 2030 to decide they do own bridge and do something with it perhaps as phase 2 of Stationlands project or the money goes back into crl.