Facts, only when they are convenient to your personal beliefs! We should be muzzling scientist as well right?
Yes. And Doberman puppies.
My point was that your selection of 'lies' by Mr. Vaughn don't sound, to me, as... that bad, and maybe not even.. y'know... 'lies', if you define 'lies' like I do, which is to say, 'untruths':
1. Since Ports Toronto won't actually, y'know, tell anyone what their plans are, anyone can scaremonger in whatever direction they want, but it's more than plausible that an extended runway might also needed to be widened, or at least the tree coverage knocked down for better sightlines. I doubt it, but then, I'm not scaremongering. But, I definitely think Ports Toronto can do better than not have ANY idea of what a preliminary design might be:
http://www.portstoronto.com/PortsTo...oronto-City-Ai/Preliminary-Runway-Design.aspx
2. According to Wikipedia's history of the island, the Hanlans were there from the 1880s and others before them as far back as the 1830s. If you're talking just about the residential community on Algonquin, that seems to have been laid out
because the airport was built, to accommodate cottagers that were displaced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Islands
So to say that 'the residential community does not predate the airport' would be technically true, only if you meant the specific community now there. Well parsed, though.
3. What Vaughn and the anti-airport types wanted was a berm that would have cost millions, but would have effectively cut noise. Putting $900k into sound barriers but millions into a tunnel is... not really what the anti-airport types would see as 'working hard to mitigate noise pollution.'
I get that Vaughn gets
wwwaaayyy up lots of people's noses, but c'mon.