No offense but the whole "John Tory is conservative but there's good somewhere deep inside" rhetoric is pure bullshit and that's how we ended up with Ford or the Tory himself in the first place. There's no such thing as a progressive conservative, that's a misnomer created to fool shallow voters into vote for them while pushing the exact same despicable agenda. I'm sure Tory in his private life is just as misogynistic and racist as his buddy Nick Kouvalis or whatever.
That really is a bit much.
Aside from being a very over-the-top assault on Tory when critiquing his timidity and lack of willingness to raise taxes above inflation would be much fairer and more justified.......
The term Progressive Conservative is a result of renewal of the Federal Party during WWII w/the election of the leader of the Manitoba Progressive Party as leader of the then Conservatives.
It should be said the party's name when John A. was first elected was the Liberal Conservative Party.
The party's Ontario version is responsible for the creation of OHIP, expansion of low-cost post-secondary education, significant spending on mass transit, and public housing.
While the Federal Party, of Brian Mulroney no less, was honoured with the Greenest Government award. (owes much of that to Lucien Bouchard who was a committed green.)
A fairer criticism would be that the party from Frank Miller forward in Ontario has been much less progressive, like wise the now Conservative Party of Canada' at the federal level.
There are progressives in both parties, but they certainly are not the driving force.
Regardless it is entirely possible to be a classic conservative (progress should be slow and measured, history revered, budgets balanced etc.)
While also being a progressive (being socially inclusive, open to change, valuing the environment and honouring social obligations)
I'll grant we don't see enough of that, but we do a great disservice to politics if we rule out its possibility.