This project was handed to our office, Turner Fleischer Architects several months ago.
My colleague is currently working on this. I don't want to post our progress without her consent.
 
the plans belong to the client as they paid for them, so Pinnacle likely took the design architects plans (HP) and brought them to Turner Fleisher for the functional design portion. (Interior design, suite layouts, utility layouts, construction management plan, etc.) the look of building is HPs, but Turner Fleisher is managing its construction and how the building functions.
 
This is nonsense. You sell units based on the information presented to the public then switch to an inferior firm. Happens way too often. I'm ready to be disappointed by the finished product.

Although pinnacle hasn't produced anything above average even with HPA so maybe it doesn't even matter.
 
TheKingEast said:
This is nonsense. You sell units based on the information presented to the public then switch to an inferior firm. Happens way too often. I'm ready to be disappointed by the finished product.

Although pinnacle hasn't produced anything above average even with HPA so maybe it doesn't even matter.
Click to expand...

Yup, I was always wary about this project. Good design... but Pinnacle. They've cheapened other HPA designs before (see Pinnacle on Adelaide). The other shoe has finally dropped.
 
Ramako said:
Yup, I was always wary about this project. Good design... but Pinnacle. They've cheapened other HPA designs before (see Pinnacle on Adelaide). The other shoe has finally dropped.
Click to expand...

I wonder whether it is Pinnacle going for TF on their own volition or HPA refusing to cheapen.

AoD
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top