News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

In this article (dated June 7’th) from Joe Mihevc’s latest e-newsletter, he states: “ Phase III of the transit improvement project is expected to start late next monthâ€. So we’re talking late July now? Not April, not mid-June.
I know the re-insertion of the stops at Wychwood was blamed for delaying things back in the spring. Anyone know why the start date keeps moving into the future? Is there a lack of resources at the City or TTC, or a lack of contractors available to do the work? How will we get Transit City built?

Key!!
Watermain replacement will happen first if you read Joe posting.

Why do things twice when it can be done once?

Vaughan is tore up now for the waterline.

There a lot of waterline work taking place just south of St Clair.
 
Key!!
Watermain replacement will happen first if you read Joe posting.

Why do things twice when it can be done once?

Vaughan is tore up now for the waterline.

There a lot of waterline work taking place just south of St Clair.

Are you saying Phase III construction cannot begin until the watermain on Vaughan is completed?
The new pipe is already in place under Vaughan, tied in at St. Clair and water was being flushed through it onto the road the other day.
Phase III was to begin in the spring and the watermain has been in the plan for a long time. The new rails have been sitting in the middle of the road for months and Hydro has moved traffic signals onto temporary poles. I'm just wondering why half the construction season is passing by before the real work begins?
 
I'm just wondering why half the construction season is passing by before the real work begins?[/QUOTE]

Because we live in Toronto and that is how things are done.
 
Have you look at what is taking place on Vaughan?

As I walked past the place today, copper pipe and fitting where being install for the first of the many place where the water line connect to the stores and houses along the street.

I believe only 3 of the other 30 plus location is just getting underway. Did not take any photos for this area compare to Bathurst and St Clair

There are places to be done on St Clair also.

Lansdowne to Caledonia was close to westbound traffic Friday until 6pm due to tearing up parts of the road and pouring concrete. Took us 10 minutes to travel this section at 3pm.

It will not be ready to open at 6pm as there no place to drive without falling into the fresh pour concrete. Asphalt may be put down tonight.

Traffic was rerouted to Davenport.

On top of this, a carnival is underway in the park with rides.

The last of the sidewalk work should be finish by the 20th on the north side except where the paver's have to go unless they show up next week.

2 of the spare streetcars are in service as 4149/85 are sitting in the westbound track now.

If these cars cannot be put back into service and anymore than 1 fails over the next 2 months, TTC will be short a streetcar or 2. If this happens, replace the streetcars with buses until 2009 when streetcars can run to Lansdowne loop.

If anyone thinks including TTC that the ROW itself can be put into operation by years end is dreaming. It taken almost 6 months to do the ROW that less than haft the size of the section. The platform still have to be built.
 
Alarm over St. Clair ROW

From the Star:

Tess Kalinowski
Transportation Reporter

The St. Clair West streetcar right-of-way once again is mired in controversy as TTC officials yesterday threw cold water on a report suggesting it's unsafe for fire trucks.

The Toronto Fire Services report suggests the right-of-way down the centre is too narrow for fire trucks to navigate safely when they must mount it to bypass traffic.

The right-of-way "is not usable by Toronto Fire Services for emergency response," says the April 9 document by District Chief Robert Leek.

Trucks risk smashing their mirrors into the streetcar power traction poles in the middle of the right-of-way, or damaging tires or equipment on curbs, the pavement being about 6 metres wide rather than the usual 9 metres. The design also poses a problem to aerial ladders and other equipment, the report says.

Fire trucks have difficulty manoeuvring around the centre poles to bypass streetcars waiting on the track to allow emergency vehicles to pass, it also said.

"This is an urgent concern of public safety for the literally tens of thousands of local residents who live in the vicinity of St. Clair Ave. W. and who rely on emergency vehicles to be able to move quickly and safely across the street," said Cesar Palacio (Ward 17-Davenport), who circulated the report.



While fire trucks can use the right-of-way, they must drive more slowly than they would in an emergency, said Fire Chief Bill Stewart. But he added: "The St. Clair roadway is safe. ... Toronto Fire Services will continue to respond to St. Clair Ave. as we've always done. If we were to work a fire there, we would have to close down the street."

St. Clair is experiencing growing traffic, and the narrower road allowance means cars have less room to move to the side to let fire trucks pass, forcing them to drive on the raised right-of-way.

Meantime, TTC officials were trying to figure out why the objections surfaced so long after key sections of the line were finished and only a year from the projected finish date.

The centre pole configuration, considered more attractive than wires hanging from each end of the street, had fire department approval, said TTC vice-chair Councillor Joe Mihevc (Ward 21-St. Paul's).

"I can assure you the fire department ... has signed off on the plans and have deemed the right-of-way safe. Is it ideal? No, it isn't ideal. Is it ideal for motorists? No, it isn't ideal because in some places it is 3-metre-wide lanes. Everybody had to pinch a little bit."

ser71%5Cs0071_it6246.jpg

I can see the problem with the grass and stones in the right-of-way. Maybe they should fill in with concrete.

2370453871_69dafcb2bb_b.jpg

Okay, but the poles could be put to one side.

2370456219_b2e8aa410b_b.jpg

Okay, some of them are. Maybe they could put more of them in.

Just how wide are the the fire trucks? How wide are buses?

If the right-of-way is still too narrow, its a good thing a BRT was not put in as the right-of-way would have to be even wider.
 
Bloody hell to firemen. If it were up to them every square inch of the city would be paved for their damn trucks. I don't exactly see Europe burning down in flames despite their narrow streets. If they have been purchasing the wrong vehicles for our city, perhaps they should reconsider.
 
Part of the problem was with amalgamation. Not only did the new Fire Department want a standard vehicle, it was dominated by suburban heads, like former NYFD [not FDNY] Chief Al Speed.

There's got to be even some North American cities that need fire engines suited to smaller streets, like Boston, Quebec, and San Francisco (if only to climb some of those steep, narrow residental streets). When there, I didn't look closely at their engines, but I also think one size does not fit all.

The only valid point is that the centre poles are a problem. Buses can not easily use the ROW either in the event of a streetcar outage, except in areas immediately around St. Clair West Station. Spadina still looks good with the span wires.
 
This is unbelievable. How many years has the TTC and the city been planning this ROW? How many environmental assessments and changes and amendments were made throughout the design and construction process? How delayed has this project already been? Now that a significant portion of the line is finished does the fire department complain about design flaws?? C’mon people!!
 
The fire engines have sirens - use them - and if the drivers fails to yield, prosecute them. There are narrower streets than St. Clair and did anyone suggests that we should have a ROW for emergency vehicles? No.

What the city really need is executive powers to crack the whip where needs be to makes sure these ABCs don't run around working contrary to the interests of the city as a whole.

As to TFS specifics - if they have had their way, places like the Regent Park redevelopment would have looked distinctively suburban (esp. wrt street width). It's not like they didn't try.

AoD
 
From the Post:

Hall Monitor: St. Clair streetcar right-of-way under fire... by fire department
Posted: June 18, 2008, 5:13 PM by Allison Hanes
TTC, Hall Monitor, St. Clair W., street car right-of-way

The much-maligned St. Clair streetcar right-of-way has been under fire from local residents virtually since its inception. But now a fire department report has validated some of their initial concerns – suggesting that the placement of the poles down the centre of the dedicated transit line make it too narrow for fire engines to navigate and thus could cause delays in emergency response times.

“Our concerns have been vindicated by this report… but it’s not a pleasant feeling to be vindicated,†said Margaret Smith, chair of Save Our St. Clair, a grassroots group that has spent years countering the 6.7-kilometre, $95-million project. “I would much rather have been wrong than to be in this situation today.â€

The two-month-old report was made public yesterday by city councillor Cesar Palacio (Davenport) another avid opponent, who posted in on his web site. He said it was drafted in response to a series of questions he asked last fall.

"It’s a design flaw in my opinion," Mr. Palacio said. "The centre poles that have been built will be an impediment to the fire trucks, where the vehicles can be damaged or they can flip over… even they go as far to say that a head-on collision with the TTC may happen."

Due to the central row of poles, the 30-metre intervals between them and the six- to nine-inch curbs separating the right-of-way from vehicle traffic on St. Clair, the report warns there is a risk that 42-foot-long fire trucks could damage their tires, sheer off their mirrors, scrape their sides – even flip over or collide head on with streetcars.

“The TTC ROW as constructed on St. Clair Ave. W. is not useable by Toronto Fire Services for emergency response,†the report states. “There is no doubt that there will be delays in emergency vehicle responses on St. Clair Ave. W.â€

Bill Stewart, Toronto’s Fire Chief, endorsed the report’s findings while in the same breath seeking to reassure the public.

“Certainly from my perspective the report is factual,†Chief Stewart said in interview. “But I’ll make it very clear, St. Clair’s a safe street. We’re going to continue to respond to the residents as we’ve always done.â€

He said he hoped to sit down with city officials to discuss the issues and possible solutions.

The fire, police and ambulance were involved in the project consultation process from the beginning and signed off on the deisgn, noted TTC chair Adam Giambrone.

“My understanding is when they designed it they felt it was safe,†Mr. Giambrone, who is also the city councillor for Davenport, said. “Assessments change over time. What works today doesn’t necessarily work tomorrow… We need to make this work and these are the kinds of things that come up all the time and we’ll work with the Toronto fire department to make sure things are safe.â€

He stopped short of saying whether the poles would be reconfigured on the already completed portion from Yonge St. to just beyond Bathurst St. or if construction might be halted on the continuing phases westward to just past Keele St.

Mr. Palacio (Davenport) said his constituents are “up in arms†but noted the design of the St. Clair streetcar lanes has implications for all Torontonians.
“This is a prototype that we’re creating for other exclusive right-of-ways across the city,†he said. “It’s a design flaw in my opinion.â€
Councillor Frances Nunziata (York South-Weston) was incredulous that such a problem could arise despite extensive consultation on the project.

“They realized once it was built ‘Geez, we have a problem here.’ So somebody goofed somewhere,†she said. “That’s the only thing I can assume. Because if they knew about it, it shouldn’t have been built."

National Post
ahanes@nationalpost.com

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/...ght-of-way-under-fire-by-fire-department.aspx
_________________________________________________________________

“The TTC ROW as constructed on St. Clair Ave. W. is not useable by Toronto Fire Services for emergency response,†the report states. “There is no doubt that there will be delays in emergency vehicle responses on St. Clair Ave. W.â€

“Certainly from my perspective the report is factual,†Chief Stewart said in interview. “But I’ll make it very clear, St. Clair’s a safe street. We’re going to continue to respond to the residents as we’ve always done.

So what is it exactly? That there will be delays, but it won't matter? What's the point of this fuzz then, exactly? As to Cesar Palacio - I think his intentions are patently clear.

AoD
 
why don't they just make the rest of the row a bit wider or not use center poles?
 
I saw a fire truck on the ROW yesterday. It was going west from Yonge street. Once it reached the area with centre poles it drove off the ROW and back into regular traffic. I noticed at that time that they did this very gingerly, taking about 20 seconds to drive off the ROW.


On other St. Clair issues...

St. Clair West station seems to be under construction again. There are trenches dug out about a foot deep along the tracks and expansion joints. Temporary covers are placed on top of the trenches during the day so that the buses can drive on them, very noisily.

All three spare streetcars are in use now. Maintenance crews are on site working on the three disabled cars parked at Vaughan. I noticed one bus was drafted to run the St. Clair to St. Clair West route this morning. Perhaps there is another disabled car parked somewhere else I didn't notice.
 
One or both of the firehouses in the area (Yorkville and Balmoral) seem to be getting new Volvo fire trucks that are much narrower than the trucks they've been currently using, so this may all be a moot point very soon. I've seen them on a couple of calls recently in my area, and they really do take up much less room than the other equipment. Very sharp-looking vehicles, with a unique-sounding siren.
 
Smaller trucks are the key. Maybe dangling the "smaller trucks = cheaper trucks = possibly more of them" carrot might win over the department.
 
As already posted, fire trucks come in many sizes. It's good to hear of the new Volvo trucks. Most calls seem to be for medical emergencies, it seems to me. Anyone here knowledgeable as to why they send fire trucks out to assist someone who has collapsed/fallen ill/with no fire to be seen anywhere??
 

Back
Top