AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Well, the project does seem (and I emphasize the word seems) to have too many stakeholders. I am sure it will be worth it given the centrality of the site, but that cost extra time and money.
The architect has already said that the proposal cannot be value-engineered further (it was in a previous staff report) - I think the city should consider adding/raising additional s37 funding and have the community raise some of the funds in order to keep the ball rolling. Let's put it this way - with densification of the core, SLC can only be used more intensely than it is now. That said, the city report need to highlight the fact that the city has done its' fiduciary duties and covered all the bases.
AoD
The architect has already said that the proposal cannot be value-engineered further (it was in a previous staff report) - I think the city should consider adding/raising additional s37 funding and have the community raise some of the funds in order to keep the ball rolling. Let's put it this way - with densification of the core, SLC can only be used more intensely than it is now. That said, the city report need to highlight the fact that the city has done its' fiduciary duties and covered all the bases.
AoD
Last edited: