News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

Oooo, got me. Are you mad someone's challenging the green dogma?

Ontario's got a clean grid, by global standards, I'm aware of that. Not the case for most other grids. Drum referred to transit systems writ large converting to ebuses; meaning most of these conversions would be drawing power from less than clean grids.

The same concerns exist for battery disposal as do for solar panels and wind mills i.e. dumped in a field in Africa somewhere.

EVs running on dirty electricity are still cleaner than diesel buses, because the efficiency of the power plant is much higher than that of a diesel engine and mechanical transmission; while power lines and transformers are more efficient at moving electricity than refineries, tankers, pipelines, and pumps are at converting and moving oil/diesel. I'd already touched on that in the post you replied to.

You're amazingly convinced that batteries are dumped in a field, but that's just a Koch brother's fabrication peddled on Fox News and Breitbart, not reality. Some will be, most won't.
 
Last edited:
So given that the downtown is dead and will never recover to pre-pandemic status, why are we still investing in transit in the same old ways? How will we repurpose the TTC in a better way? Certainly car ownership is up and may people who live downtown now drive. So aside from pumping more money into a dying institution, what do transit experts propose?
 
So given that the downtown is dead and will never recover to pre-pandemic status

What an entirely preposterous statement for which you have absolutely no evidence. Strange first post.

, why are we still investing in transit in the same old ways? How will we repurpose the TTC in a better way? Certainly car ownership is up and may people who live downtown now drive. So aside from pumping more money into a dying institution, what do transit experts propose?

As your underlying premise is unsound; there is no useful reply to be given.
 
What an entirely preposterous statement for which you have absolutely no evidence. Strange first post.



As your underlying premise is unsound; there is no useful reply to be given.
Okay. What a strange elitist approach.

Anyways. We know downtown foot traffic is down 46%. We know wfh is here to stay with max around three days a week in office and we know TTC ridership still hasn’t recovered.

These are things we know.
 
Anyways. We know downtown foot traffic is down 46%. We know wfh is here to stay with max around three days a week in office and we know TTC ridership still hasn’t recovered.

These are thing we know.
Foot traffic is down 45% right now when compared to pre-COVID, sure.

But there is no indication that it will be staying there in the long term. There are a lot of companies who are planning on going back to or increasing the amount of in-office attendance starting in the new year.

Right now, it seems as if the only industry that is looking at any sort of long-term WFH package is Government, and that is a pretty small proportion of the currently occupied office space in downtown Toronto.

Dan
 
Okay. What a strange elitist approach.

There is nothing 'elitist' in what I said, or how I said it.

The premise you put forward was very extreme to the point of being provably untrue with little effort.

If you had said something more moderate, there may have been a useful conversation to be had.

"Downtown is Dead" Is not true today; what is true is that worker count and foot fall are down materially.

If you went down to the Eaton Centre over the holidays, it was packed. If you attended a Leafs game, same deal; if you visited one of the downtown supermarkets, you would have seen long lines and high traffic, to the point where more supermarkets are now being built with 3 due to open in the next 18 months.


Anyways. We know downtown foot traffic is down 46%

This part, we arguably know.

. We know wfh is here to stay with max around three days a week in office and we know TTC ridership still hasn’t recovered.

These are things we know.

This part we most certainly do not know. Your conclusion is premature.

The TTC is at 69% of pre-pandemic ridership as at the first week of December.

1672518230586.png


From: https://ttc-cdn.azureedge.net/-/med...8055352&hash=D3DF6A6AF744C6117123DF471C801AA8

While still low, its hardly apocalyptic.

Its worth adding that very poor GO Service levels and lesser TTC service levels are contributing factors; which one would hope will be fully resolved by the close of 2023.

Downtown Toronto will add over 10,000 residents this coming year.

It will almost certainly add employment as well.

The notion of 'repurposing' the TTC is utterly bizarre in that context.

****

We don't have exact data in yet, but I'm told Retail footfall/sales in downtown is also higher since that report you quoted which used Sept' 22 data; if you extracted the PATH-based numbers, it actually looks pretty good, as the PATH is far more effected than is main-street retail.

That's not to suggest there aren't headwinds. Indeed, there are.

There certainly seems to be a probable shift to greater off-peak transit service vs peak.

I do expect WFH will have some lasting structural effect, though less than many seem to think. But I anticipate this will be almost entirely offset by employment growth.
 
Last edited:
To add to the above: even if downtown were never to recover, referring to transit as a dying institution is absolutely ludicrous. There are so many more places transit runs than just downtown. The jam packed buses running around in Etobicoke or Scarborough certainly don't point me to an institution that is dying.
 
So given that the downtown is dead and will never recover to pre-pandemic status, why are we still investing in transit in the same old ways? How will we repurpose the TTC in a better way? Certainly car ownership is up and may people who live downtown now drive. So aside from pumping more money into a dying institution, what do transit experts propose?
Even accepting the essential premise of your statement for the sake of a constructive end to 2022, the reality is that what COVID demand reduction has done is thrown a lifeline to a transit network which was a decade, or multiple decades, behind demand growth - particularly Yonge/Bloor station. We are also seeing some parts of the system recover to much nearer prior demand.

As for car ownership being up - you provide no statistics for this. Given the growth in the city and regional population, it is quite possible that cars/100k pop are not increasing. New developments have less parking.

If there is a problem with transit planning in Toronto it is that the provincial government is planning a large chunk of that transit, and now developments nearby too, with little contribution from municipal government until plans are set in political concrete.
 

Back
Top