That argument never sat well with me. Criminals don't care if something is legal or not. They'll have weapons regardless. Our laws make it more difficult for ordinary people to defend themselves.
The problem with this argument, with great respect, is that the evidence does not support it.
Virtually every country with tough control on firearms sees far fewer victims of firearms crime.
Virtually every country with tight control on other types of weapons see less of that type of crime.
The developed country with the fewest controls (The U.S.) sees the greatest amount of violent crime.
I'm not sure why you advocate for more violent crime and more victims. I'm sure you don't mean to, but the evidence suggests that for which are you advocating would achieve just that.
***
I'm almost amused by this 'criminals don't care' nonsense.
Sure they do.
1) If its a criminal offense simply to possess a weapon, even if you don't use it, fewer people will have it on their person, and therefore fewer will commit crimes with said weapons.
2) Convenience matters. If you want to use a weapon to commit a crime, it matters if its on your person, in your car, or available at the Wal-Mart down the street for purchase. If you have to go home to get it, or buy it on the black market, the impulse
to acquire such a weapon diminishes and the situation passes.
3) Price Matters. When weapons are illegal, they are invariably more expensive to purchase. Can the mafia or a large gang still afford them?, yes. However, most street criminals are not provided free weapons by a gang or the mafia. They have to buy them. When a handgun sets you back $1,400 a lot fewer criminals buy them and use them. Likewise pepperspray or switchblades.
The evidence is clear on all of the above points and reflected in crime stats around the globe.
****
Perhaps though, this sub-thread discussion has run its course and we can move on to other matters TTC?