News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 5.8K     0 

generalcanada said:

What the TTC workers union won in last-minute deal

The last-minute deal between the TTC and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 late Thursday night averted a strike that would have shut down the transit network.
www.thestar.com
ben spurr with the latest on what the union won

3 year deal

averaging about 4.5% increases per year for 13% over 3 years. union wanted 18/3 ttc wanted around 10
some provisions for no contracting out and as discussed above no yrt/miway busses picking up passengers in Toronto are the major highlights.
Click to expand...

A snip from the above:

1717801845663.png


The contracting-in of maintenance jobs has my attention.

@smallspy would likely know, but to my recollection the in-station staff are all Commission employees, the contracted out jobs were for overnight bus and streetcar cleaning.

I wonder if that is coming back in-house.
 
It’s unclear to me what the city ‘won’ here. I guess the lower wage increase? Seems like they agreed to every other demand.
 
Oh FFS, the ATU is being moronic about making the TTC unable to allow MiWay buses serving riders in Toronto (i'm purposeful omitting YRT from the discussion as their service is abysmal trash anyways). This part of the deal really pisses me off.

No one would lose their jobs if other agencies took over some routes for the TTC, especially since the TTC seems to be disinterested in providing adequate service along many of those candidate routes anyways. I'm all for bashing the TTC where it is appropriate, but in this particular case the ATU is content with screwing riders in favor of "not contracting out jobs".
 
Amare said:
Oh FFS, the ATU is being moronic about making the TTC unable to allow MiWay buses serving riders in Toronto (i'm purposeful omitting YRT from the discussion as their service is abysmal trash anyways). This part of the deal really pisses me off.

No one would lose their jobs if other agencies took over some routes for the TTC, especially since the TTC seems to be disinterested in providing adequate service along many of those candidate routes anyways. I'm all for bashing the TTC where it is appropriate, but in this particular case the ATU is content with screwing riders in favor of "not contracting out jobs".
Click to expand...
Both MiWay and TTC are part of the same union. Just different locals. Why can't they get together and hammer out a route sharing agreement?
 
Amare said:
... making the TTC unable to allow MiWay buses serving riders in Toronto...
Click to expand...
Do we know how far we got into the Cross boundary service integration pilot project? I assume this kills it?

I'm familiar with DRT that has a closed door policy (allowing pickup on the way to Durham, and drop off on the way out)... I presume this is not impacted by the recent agreement.

From the pilot project:
Screenshot_20240608_082907.jpg

I don't think we made it to phase 3 of the pilot as I've never seen the open door policy on DRT routes?
 
Northern Light said:
A snip from the above:

View attachment 570671

The contracting-in of maintenance jobs has my attention.

@smallspy would likely know, but to my recollection the in-station staff are all Commission employees, the contracted out jobs were for overnight bus and streetcar cleaning.

I wonder if that is coming back in-house.
Click to expand...
Other than the vehicle cleaners, I think that there are two, separate concerns that were raised by the union regarding contracting out within maintenance. One aspect has been the sending out of complex components like engines and transmissions and electrical components to third parties for rebuild or exchange. The union has been fighting to bring this back in-house for a long time, and I wonder if this was one of the points that they were sticking on. I've also been told that the union was apparently upset about the contractors working in the divisions performing warranty repairs to the various new vehicles - it sounds like one of the wins was that TTC's own staff will now be performing this work, with the warranty techs looking on.

The red vests used at the various subway closures/detours are all contracted. To be honest, I'm not sure that they could get enough staff without hiring more to handle their jobs. They'd also been trying to get some of the station cleaning jobs contracted out, but I don't believe that they were successful on that.

Dan
 
Coolibop said:
Do we know how far we got into the Cross boundary service integration pilot project? I assume this kills it?

I'm familiar with DRT that has a closed door policy (allowing pickup on the way to Durham, and drop off on the way out)... I presume this is not impacted by the recent agreement.

From the pilot project:
View attachment 570799
I don't think we made it to phase 3 of the pilot as I've never seen the open door policy on DRT routes?
Click to expand...
The General Manager of DRT mentioned there were talks into having an open-door policy along Ellesmere Road. The new agreement probably kills any chance of that for the short-term.
 
T3G said:
personal transportation such as bikes
Click to expand...
I can't say how much happier I've been ever since I took up biking as the primary means of getting around the city for the past 7 months, and only spending on average 20$/month on Presto, only setting foot on the TTC 1–5 days/month (has only been 1 day in May).
 
I guess its time for Ford to do some Union busting to have Cross boundary service by eliminating transit systems or put them under Metrolinx control that was proposed back in 2007

The Union thinks jobs will be lost over these Cross boundary routes, they are sadly wrong. Any route that is cut from TTC that are part of a chopping list for a few decades will move to another route or division as they will be needed to fill retiring drivers positions or routes that need to be beef up.

The quality of service for TTC route 49 and 50 is less today than it was 10 years ago which already seen a bus removed from those routes. There is not much on the books for new development along those routes other than 2 on each route today with 49 seeing one for it under construction now that was proposed in 2016..
 
picard102 said:
Yeah that seems like the kind of terrible thing Ford would be into. But he might be shy after losing to unions on bill 124, or realize he should just not do something so heinous.
Click to expand...
Seems a pretty minor government change in the great scheme of things. It could surely be done at a stroke of a cabinet pen.

And in the bigger picture, it would still be union workers driving the buses.
 
Ford has enough sense to not provoke the blue collar unions, he needs their support to disincent them from backing teachers and nurses who the government has a more direct win-lose positioning with.

I am surprised that the cross-border pickup issue is so important to the unions in a context where transit is expanding and facing labour shortages and any workers displaced will almost certainly just shift to some other route.

"Job security" in publicly funded transit should not lead to made-up jobs.

- Paul
 
picard102 said:
Yeah that seems like the kind of terrible thing Ford would be into. But he might be shy after losing to unions on bill 124, or realize he should just not do something so heinous.
Click to expand...

Or he just pull a 'beer in corner stores' move and pay thew workers off to amend the agreement.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top
NEWSDATABASEMAPFORUMSERVICESUTProLOG IN
CITIES