ChazYEG
Senior Member
Actually, Seattle proper is about 100k larger than Vancouver, and Seattle metro is about 900K larger. Edmonton and Calgary suffer from the opposite effect: Calgary proper is estimated at 1.4M and Edmonton at 1.1M, a 300k difference, but Edmonton metro is at about 1.52M and Calgary at around 1.61M, a 90k difference, only. So the difference there is quite a lot bigger than Calgary and Edmonton (even proportionally).The difference between Edmonton and Calgary's metro population is not that big (around 100,000) on over 1.5 million, which surprisingly few people out province realize.
This would be like comparing Seattle and Vancouver. Last time I checked, which was sometime ago Seattle was a bit bigger than Vancouver by a similar amount.
I think the population difference only translates into a few more constituencies out of over 80. It is not the reason. The real reason is the UCP is not competitive in Edmonton (1 seat only which they may lose) and they are in a number of likely close races in Calgary.
That is a negligible difference and I believe it only translates into 1 or 2 extra constituencies in the Calgary CMA over Edmonton CMA.
Last edited: