Avenuer
Senior Member
Duplexes too, anything between SDFs and condo apartments in terms of pricing are doing very well right now.Oof those price jumps for townhomes
|
|
|
Duplexes too, anything between SDFs and condo apartments in terms of pricing are doing very well right now.Oof those price jumps for townhomes
Ya more high quality product to buy, for years Edmonton was a wash in old 1970’s toen homes that were rentals turned condos.Oof those price jumps for townhomes
The way Edmonton has evolved over the years should be embraced rather than changed, according to one panelist, and it starts with accepting the core for what it is.
Unlike most cities, which see their downtowns as the must-be place for commerce and entertainment, Edmonton’s growth has been on its outskirts. That has created a doughnut effect, with downtown as the hole in the middle.
But the city must shrug off suggestions its downtown needs to be like Toronto or Vancouver and continue to do its own thing, Rohit Gupta of Rohit Group of Cos. said.
Gupta urged the audience to continue growth around the city rather than worrying about whether the downtown is as vibrant as other centres.
“Let’s just be different, who cares?” he said. “Keep Edmonton weird.”
But isn't it kind of accurate? I mean, it goes against current prevailing thought regarding development patterns, etc. That alone should qualify as weird. The principle of doing our own thing and being proud of it does resonate. (Even if the execution is something people could disagree about).A developer saying "Keep Edmonton Weird" while championing soulless suburban auto-centric development is one of the most laughable things I've read in a long time, and I've seen some howlers from the property development industry.
I would think no? At least in the North American context, suburbs have outpaced urban areas in terms of growth in the past several decades by a wide margin. (Pew, TD, Smart Prosperity) There's nothing particularly "weird" about what the Edmonton development industry is doing.But isn't it kind of accurate?
This is so annoying. Bro. Look at the perceptions of our city…. Look at our tax bases….look at local businesses struggling.https://reactnews.com/article/industrial-rising-takeaways-from-the-edmonton-real-estate-forum/
I'm sorry but I can't help but fully disagree with this, especially since developers aren't saddled with the infrastructure debt/maintenance of these areas. I get that Rohit is mostly a suburban developer (which means they're invested in continued suburban growth) but this is still an extremely disappointing viewpoint to be had and I wish that we don't follow this at all as a template.
Keep Edmonton weird doesn't mean continuing suburban sprawl :/
I can get behind that.I’m fine if we pivot our downtown/quarters to try to make it more like Oliver/Strathcona, accepting that the density and commercial towers just won’t ever meet demand. But we can’t “forget downtown”.
Let’s plant a ton more trees, get a ton of 5 over 1s and townhomes going. And let that be Edmontons unique approach, a more green, quieter, residential, and pleasant core vs the concrete/glass/busyness of most downtowns.
Over the years, they have planted a lots of trees downtown. Many have died from neglect or vandalism and some of the successful ones have been torn out when the next bright idea to redevelop something came about.This is so annoying. Bro. Look at the perceptions of our city…. Look at our tax bases….look at local businesses struggling.
No one is trying to make us Toronto. But empty plots of land all over downtown isn’t working either.
I’m fine if we pivot our downtown/quarters to try to make it more like Oliver/Strathcona, accepting that the density and commercial towers just won’t ever meet demand. But we can’t “forget downtown”.
Let’s plant a ton more trees, get a ton of 5 over 1s and townhomes going. And let that be Edmontons unique approach, a more green, quieter, residential, and pleasant core vs the concrete/glass/busyness of most downtowns.