The_Cat
Senior Member
The military would only be mobilized in an emergency. Perhaps transit security could board the early trains and visit the stations early in the morning.
|
|
|
Peace officers that we’ve had for years…? Not working so well…Uhh no thanks! Peace officers would work, let's not cosplay as a military junta.
The challenge is 1) training new officers (police/peace) takes a lot of time and money 2) it’s city money vs federal 3) we use a lot of security who have little sense of intimidation or physical training to stop criminals. Your average male college athlete could probably beat up most of our transit police…without being on meth or using knives…Sure, but shouldn't we go the 'not crazy' approach and just increase peace officer presence (of which there is currently a negligible amount) on trains and stations? Typically, liberal democracies don't send in the armed forces to enforce bylaws.
We don't need the military, we just need a bit more enforcement than the so called security guards often hiding in the corner, texting or ignoring problems.The military is more ‘not crazy’ than whatever the hell we allow to happen in our stations now. I dunno, I’ve been to lots of places in Europe, such as Italy, that happily display their riffles. We need a reset and a clear message sent as to what we allow and don’t allow on public transit
Ah yes. A good ol strawman.I won't take transit until the military is frisking the buttholes of every passenger who boards the train....except me of course because I am perfect in every way.
It seems to me that the question isn't about whether people should be able to do tranq on the LRT not. The question is what is the appropriate response to social disorder and in my opinion police are only one small part of the solution.This is about crime. Drug use in areas that should be safe for kids, the elderly, etc is a crime. Full stop. If you aren’t cool with a teacher or sports coach for your kids doing tranq, why are you justifying any tolerance of it on transit.
Can't really blame the security officers who have no means of defending themselves when a potential issue arises.We don't need the military, we just need a bit more enforcement than the so called security guards often hiding in the corner, texting or ignoring problems.
Yes, I agree some kind of dedicated transit police would be better.Can't really blame the security officers who have no means of defending themselves when a potential issue arises.
And all they can do is call EPS/Peace Officers to come assist them and by the time most of them arrive, they suspects have probably taken off.
I maintain a dedicated transit police of some kind (EPS/Peace Officers, etc.) needs to be an option, and not just a once in a while thing.
there has been a noted increase of Peace Officers and police on the system, but they need to be spread out not a gaggle of 6 ticketing 1 guy at century while trains come and go and not 1 person was fair checked, meanwhile things be happening elsewhere.We don't need the military, we just need a bit more enforcement than the so called security guards often hiding in the corner, texting or ignoring problems.
Who are never around…Peace officers that we’ve had for years…? Not working so well…