I agree as well. If the crackdown on delivery trucks has done anything, it's forced the delivery companies and facility owners to think harder about where and how deliveries are made. Perhaps all buildings in the downtown core with institutional or commercial use should be designed with a delivery lane, and we could have endeavoured on some big planning study to make the necessary bylaw changes, and a program to make changes to legacy buildings without. But is that the best way?
I think Tory is in the mindset that the free market will help correct this issue, and to an extent I agree. If you own an office building, and you don't have a delivery lane, it's now more difficult to get stuff delivered if a truck is at risk of being towed. This could increase the cost of deliveries, or delivery companies could simply refuse to serve you. That's going to force you as a building owner to a) make a delivery lane, or b) look at attracting tenants that don't really require delivery trucks. On the other hand, the tenants themselves are also going to face more difficulty, and it will make them think harder about, "Does this really need to be physically delivered?" It may just be a simple change in business operation to solve that.
Considering all that facets, do we want to spend money on a big complicated planning exercise if the free market may solve the problem itself depending on what certain people need? I don't think we do in this case.