Jaye101
Active Member
You're missing the point. How are commuters in the Lansdowne corridor helped whatsoever via a Dufferin alignment? Staying on Queen till Roncesvalles could (and should result) in a station at Queen/Lansdowne/Jameson, providing not only direct relief for the 47 bus but for the thousands of low-income "priority neighbourhood" residents in the apartments just to the south along Jameson.
The reason Parkside is marketable is precisely because it doesn't need any intermediate stations between Queen and Bloor and can be trenched or cut-and-cover constructed parallel to the roadway at relative meagre expense ($175m/km ballpark). No other corridor, neither Roncy and especially not Dufferin can be built without TBM costing multibillions of dollars. Real tunneling would only need to occur between Bloor and St Clair, 2 kms versus 4.
Dipping the subway south again away from Queen is also not very wise. Like @steveintoronto said, people are trying to do way too many things with the one line. A straight direct run from Osgoode to St Joseph's then up the Keele and Weston-Galt is symmetrical and offers the most coverage (Parkdale, High Park, Junction, Silverthorn, Mount Dennis, Weston, Rexdale).
So we are in agreeance then that Jane is the wrong corridor for the DRL to route? A diagonal line from Humber College to downtown meanwhile would be truly transformative and be the most bang for our bucks.
Not needing stops between Queen and Bloor is indicative of the poor choice of route.
Lansdowne is a 5 minute walk from Dufferin. Save your money by using Parkside and you'll be forced to build a tunnel on Dufferin anyways. Again, I'm missing the point on what's so pressing about on Roncesvalles routing. Don't exactly see the crowding or cross route relief you see on a Dufferin routing. The route you're suggesting already has GO and UPX running for much of the length, what's the point? Dufferin is crowded, University is crowded, the 505 and 506 need relief.
Not going to argue my points any further, just offering my insight. You make good points and I understand your perspective even though I do not agree.