|
|
|
With that being said, Chow and Tory are not really wow-ing me. Even putting personalities aside and focusing on policies, both are quite lacking IMO. I keep thinking, is this the best that TO has to offer, that can't be true.
Soks was the best TO had to offer...and look where that got him.
New to site - long time lurker. Don't know how to link yet but someone check out the Law Society tribunal website for the most recent Notice of Application (Tracy Foster) and explain to me what I just read. Thanks!
I live downtown. SanRemo is so far west it's nearly Alderwood, and transit isn't the most frequent out that way.
When we borrow/rent a car, we usually head out that way and then follow it up with High Park.
But they are some of the best doughnuts in town, better than some of the newer, trendier joints. Though I like Glory Hole's doughnuts better, SanRemo has better hours.
http://www.gloryholedoughnuts.com/Is there really a glory hole doughnuts or are you just seeing if we are paying attention?
i can't find it, and a search of their website for tracy foster comes up emptyNew to site - long time lurker. Don't know how to link yet but someone check out the Law Society tribunal website for the most recent Notice of Application (Tracy Foster) and explain to me what I just read. Thanks!
New to site - long time lurker. Don't know how to link yet but someone check out the Law Society tribunal website for the most recent Notice of Application (Tracy Foster) and explain to me what I just read. Thanks!
I would have thought Tory pays Kouvalis to think for him in matters like these; can't believe Tory would go rogue and do something like this on his own. It's not a minor fumble, like answering an unexpected question poorly. It's something that was decided. So if you can't figure out why Tory would do this, maybe try to figure out why that campaign manager of his would tell him to do it.
Here's the link to a lengthy pdf - I've skimmed up to page 15 so far and can't see the relevance to this thread - maybe someone else can.