News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously, if he's not drunk in that pick, I'm going to chime in with Adma. Is he seriously ill? That's not just an unflattering picture. He looks completely gone. If that's not the case, what is causing him to look like that?

Exactly. Here we have a political dude in his early 40s with the complexion of a sickly septugenerian Soviet leader. Something's definitely wrong here; and I suspect even a lot of Fordistas would agree, even if they'd spin it in a "Ford haters dood it" way...
 
A question I now have is could these scurrilous allegations by Sarah Thomson end in criminal charges.....against Sarah Thomson?

Section 140 of the Criminal Code of Canada:

140. (1) Every one commits public mischief who, with intent to mislead, causes a peace officer to enter on or continue an investigation by

(a) making a false statement that accuses some other person of having committed an offence;

(b) doing anything intended to cause some other person to be suspected of having committed an offence that the other person has not committed, or to divert suspicion from himself;

Thomson claims to have told an officer at the event that she was sexually groped. There is a growing mountain of evidence to suggest that this did not happen. That she made up the allegations. Under section 140 of the Criminal Code of Canada she could very easily be charged with the crime of Public Mischief. A serious crime for which there are severe punishments!

Punishment

(2) Every one who commits public mischief

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Of course in a addition to criminal charges she could very likely face civil action in the form of a defamation lawsuit and since she seems to have lots of money (has a nice home in Rosedale) she has a lot to lose!
 
I don't know if you have been keeping up with all the developments throughout the day on this story but it now appears - without a shadow of doubt - that the allegations by Thomson were a total fabrication and that at no time did Ford touch Thomson in an inappropriate way. In other words it is almost certain that Ford is the victim of an ugly smear campaign. Another thing that should be noted is Ford did not drink alcohol at the event. If anyone was drunk it was Thomson in fact she still sounded inebriated when she was interviewed on NewsTalk 1010 at 6:00 AM in the morning!

Some things to consider is if she was actually grabbed in the ass wouldn't she have had an immediate involuntary reflex reaction? I would probably jump a foot off the floor if this happened to me. Also if this really did happen how could Thomson even be sure that it was Ford's hand unless she has eyes in the back of her head?

Peepers, it looks like you called this one correctly right from the start.
 
Unlike the unfailingly boring Rob Ford , Sarah Thomson possesses a sharp intellect. To suggest that there is a specific reaction to what is alleged is rather simplistic. She has self-control and class. Women deal with stupidly like this throughout their lives. She was shocked, took a deep breath and processed what had transpired. Of course she was certain that it was him after his vulgar comment to her. She's an adult and not prepared to put up with his unexceptable behaviour. Bravo Sarah, for not suffering this indignity in silence. Shine a bright light on it... and watch the bugs scurry for the dark corners.
 
Last edited:
Wow. First off, there's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much smoke around Rob Ford for there not to be fire. Second, who but a complete idiot and/or peice of garbage would think that Sarah Thomson would fabricate these accusations? Third, I knew Ford had an ugly personality (duh!), but I never would have thought he could be this out of control. But there it is, plain as day and impossible to avoid confronting: Toronto's mayor can add "sexual predator" to his resume, alongside "apparent alcoholic", "apparent wife-beater", "coward", "bully" and "double-digit IQ". Are there facts (rather than bare, hopeful, vacuous assertions from Ford supporters) that indicate otherwise? Does someone have a Ford IQ test showing "102"? Because the rest of it is a matter of public record.

Regarding the most-recent allegations, Ford would need to sue Thomson and/or force a retraction. I guess we'll see if that happens. So far, the history of stupid things Ford has done would not seem to support the argument that this is the ONE stupid thing he actually didn't do.

Some folks jump on nfitz for be overly dramatic, but it is ridiculous to think that there could be an "over" dramatization of our situation, having elected a person who seems incapable of obeying the law for more than a few days at a time, and is often overtly proud of his misdeeds. I wish there were some breed of livestock that liked to wallow in its own filth to use as a comparator, but alas Ford is beyond compare and I wouldn't want to be accused of animal cruelty by association. Folks, being overly dramatic about Rob Ford makes the dramatists the only sane people in the room. The real outrage is that Rob Ford is a topic of serious discussion. His role as "first citizen" of our city is a mark of shame on us all, like reality TV and the musical stylings of Pitbull.

I wouldn't say this next part if it weren't for the latest incident, and maybe I'm only saying it because of the misogyny and stupidity in the attacks on Sarah Thomson (whom I really, really can't stand as a politician and public persona, for the record) by Ford defenders, and ultimately maybe I will regret my own intemperance. But here it is: I can't wait until Rob Ford dies in a drunken car crash or suffocates on his own vomit, which my actuarial tables say are statistically the 2nd and 3rd most likely ways for him to die next to a massive coronary. If it's a car crash, I just hope he only kills himself in the wreck and doesn't hit anyone else, because that would make it sad.

I've said it before but it's worth saying again after the 1,843rd episode of Fordian shamelessness: I really feel sorry for Rob Ford's family. No one should have to have a father/husband like that (brother/son is a different story).
 
Unlike the unfailingly boring Rob Ford , Sarah Thomson possesses a sharp intellect. To suggest that there is a specific reaction to what is alleged is rather simplistic. She has self-control and class. Women deal with stupidly like this throughout their lives. She was sbocked, took a deep breath and processed what had transpired. Of course she was certain that it was him after his vulgar comment to her. She's an adult and not prepared to put up with his unexceptable behaviour. Bravo Sarah, for not suffering this indignity in silence. Shine a bright light on it... and watch the bugs scurry for the dark corners.

Actually, while her approach to this is a lot more "measured" than Ford's (and it probably helps that were she on Council, she'd be more the "lets try to make this work" sort a la Berardinetti or McMahon than a hardcore oppositionalist), keep in mind that Thomson's always had a reputation as a flake with past borderline-LaRoucheian associations--and while the nyah-nyahing is insufferable, Thomson-bashing Fordistas have a point: in a one-on-one mayoral race, Ford would likely pulverize Thomson. (Which might even be a subliminal setup wish on the Fordistas' part: Thomson as their dream opponent, even more so than
obvious-lefties like Chow or Vaughan.)
 
I've said it before but it's worth saying again after the 1,843rd episode of Fordian shamelessness: I really feel sorry for Rob Ford's family. No one should have to have a father/husband like that (brother/son is a different story).

Though I can see a plausible case against the Renata end; from what I gather about her family as well as similar cases within my own family, there's this weird aura of "mail-order bride" clannish opportunism about it all. Almost like *her* family is using *him* (and, uh, "daddy's money")--which in the end, makes it all the more pathetic on every single level.

The kids, meanwhile, probably add up to little more than protoplasmic emblems of "family" and "fatherhood". Again, I've witnessed similar.
 
When interviewed, she said he seemed to be on something, so no, she didn't agree he was completely sober
She did initially imply he was on something, but she also initially said she didn't think he'd been drinking. (checks dictionary) sober refers to alcohol. Presumably she initially thought he was on something else ... but she later backed down on that, and said she wasn't sure.

(presumably something else could simply be prescription medicine ...).

Politically, Thomson is nearly as conservative as Ford. Why is it that some Fordites think this a leftist consipiracy?
That's the beauty of this. It's really fun watching the extreme right-wing conspiracy theorists on this one.

I thought Thomson ran for the Liberals - not the Conservatives.
When she ran for mayor, she was a member of the PC party - and she made that very, very clear during the campaign. It was only after the election, that she decided to run from the Liberals. But she's still on the right-wing of that centrist party. Which puts her a bit right-of-centre, with the likes of Ignatieff, rather than a bit left-of-centre like Trudeau, Dion, or Rae.

It certainly doesn't put her with the left wing that is normally accused of such conspiracies.
 
Actually, while her approach to this is a lot more "measured" than Ford's

??

Going on several radio stations, several times throughout the day on Friday with an ever changing story is more "measured" than just issuing a statement.
 
Going on several radio stations, several times throughout the day on Friday with an ever changing story is more "measured" than just issuing a statement.
As far as I know, the radio stations pursued her for interviews, not vice-versa.

I know it's a strange concept for those in the extreme right wing to actually respond to requests for interviews - because they are afraid the public will figure out how extreme their views are ... but it isn't in itself unsual for normal politicians.
 
"Never accuse me of stealing or screwing around". Okay, how about misappropriation of public resources, influence peddling, sexual harrassment and sexual assault?
 
"Never accuse me of stealing or screwing around". Okay, how about misappropriation of public resources, influence peddling, sexual harrassment and sexual assault?


Rob Ford is not a molester. Our mayor may be a liar, an idiot, a pig, a molester, but he is not a porn star!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top