I'm also thinking that in York Region, they at least have an eye for potentially turning the dedicated ROWs into LRT, if the ridership could reasonably be thought to need such a capacity (they already have the stations and the ROWs, placing rails in the ROW would be comparatively quick). It would offer a reason why they are officially called "VIVA stations" instead of stops, and why the stations being used for BRT indulge in a little bit of architectural overkill, whereas for LRT, they just about fit the bill. Get the public thinking of a higher order of transit now, and changing it over to LRT down the line (15-20 years from now) isn't seen as such overkill. The planned stations on the Hurontario LRT aren't a million miles away from a VIVA station in terms of capacity and overall look.
This contrasts with Toronto. In Toronto, judging by the renders above, there is/was a certain timidity in showing that the LRT won't change anything at all, as if it's existing on sufferance, with the very real possibility of being yanked altogether. Which is true to a large extent, but there comes a time when you have to damn the torpedoes to a certain extent. A mode of mass transit shouldn't have to apologize for its existence, especially when its planners want it to be a success.
By the way, which stop is that meant to represent on Sheppard? I'm curious.