urbancog
Active Member
I'd forgotten about the initial tunneling contract; guess I wasn't following as closely back then.
Kenaidan, part of Crosstown Transit Constructors consortium, with Obayashi Canada, Kenny Construction, and Technicore Underground has a reference page on the work, which they say included "extensive instrumentation system to monitor for settlement", so Metrolinx should at least understand the scope of any settlement happening.
An Ontario Govt news item of 17-Aug-2016 stated that tunnelling was complete, with construction started station on 4 stations. Did Metrolinx have a long-term warranty clause in the agreement with Crosstown Transit Constructors that they could enforce after 8+ years? Seems unlikely. If there is a defect in the running-tunnel component, Metrolinx may have to pay for remedial grouting.
To complicate contractual matters, some of the station enclosures were mined around the original running tunnels by a different contractor under the Crosslinx contract. See here.
Kenaidan, part of Crosstown Transit Constructors consortium, with Obayashi Canada, Kenny Construction, and Technicore Underground has a reference page on the work, which they say included "extensive instrumentation system to monitor for settlement", so Metrolinx should at least understand the scope of any settlement happening.
An Ontario Govt news item of 17-Aug-2016 stated that tunnelling was complete, with construction started station on 4 stations. Did Metrolinx have a long-term warranty clause in the agreement with Crosstown Transit Constructors that they could enforce after 8+ years? Seems unlikely. If there is a defect in the running-tunnel component, Metrolinx may have to pay for remedial grouting.
To complicate contractual matters, some of the station enclosures were mined around the original running tunnels by a different contractor under the Crosslinx contract. See here.




