rbt
Senior Member
I think there would be a couple of counter arguments to that.
1) Stand up to the politicians and tell them they can't have the 'nice to haves' because you have to ensure safety and that is your highest priority.
That would be nice, though we haven't had a TTC CEO successful at reducing the SOGR backlog for a couple decades so I'm inclined to believe this isn't possible for the TTC CEO (or General Manager before that title) to do. Byford achieved more with the same money (by blowing through a warehouse of spare parts; so you can only do that once) but still saw the maintenance deficit grow during his oversight.
Even Miller as mayor struggled to reduce the SOGR gap and that was with larger than typical tax increases and adding significantly to borrowing space (by increasing amortization length; again a one-time option).
2) If you go and read the investigative reports into what happened with the SRT, its clear that many people performing the inspection of track/systems did not know what to look for (loose bolt on reaction rail) and didn't understand the relative importance when they did find it, not catergorizing it as the highest priority of repair.
Indeed. Those come down entirely to funding as well. If it was considered a critical system, we would have been sending inspection and maintenance staff to Vancouver for training.
I don't mean Leary was particularly good at the job. I wanted to point out the job is not as easy or straight forward as it should be. It's less "fix near-broken things" and more "which of the near-broken things matters today and which can be deferred 12 months", and that's on council who take directions from voters (bumping taxes 20% is a non-starter; we'd vote in a Ford equivalent shortly after who reduces them again).
Last edited: