MichaelS
Senior Member
The details of how it will be spent will be interesting to see. 7,000 homes by 2027 is a lot to bring on.
|
|
|
Yeah...no chance the actual number will be even close to 7KThe details of how it will be spent will be interesting to see. 7,000 homes by 2027 is a lot to bring on.
In most cases, I agree, but it depends on how the money is put to use.Yeah...no chance the actual number will be even close to 7K
Government has no advantage in building houses over the private sector
the amount divided by 7k is about 32k per unit, which means they're going to use this money to fund certain projects (like what the city is doing with office conversions) instead of building it themselves. They'll just end up "attributing" 7000 units that were helped in part by this funding to say they met their goal. These announcements just seem like election vote buying, it is not sustainable to just have governments subsidize homebuilding on a long term basis.Yeah...no chance the actual number will be even close to 7K
Government has no advantage in building houses over the private sector
The details of how it will be spent will be interesting to see. 7,000 homes by 2027 is a lot to bring on.
The money isn't just for government subsidized units, it is to incentivize the city for changing rules to allow more private housing production too.Yeah...no chance the actual number will be even close to 7K
Government has no advantage in building houses over the private sector
Surprised they didn't go for a more ambitious proposal considering it's facing a retirement home with a pretty wide lane that there wouldn't be as much residential pushback. I see Hillhurst block up the street is still under review, any idea why it's taking so long to get approval in this area?
Nice!