The_Cat
Senior Member
Looks like Options 1 and 2 are the finalists;
|
|
|
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
DirtShare
New Member
Hi guys, I know I’m a few months late here but figured I would show a few pictures from the yellowhead project I was a part of last summer. From the river to 66st. Will be doing east bound starting in May.
The_Cat
Senior Member
Looking good. Nice to see some Summer pictures!
jason403
Active Member
Can't believe that was all done in a year. Amazing work, and some amazing pictures. Thanks for posting!
Platinum107
Senior Member
If only they could move that fast on the LRT projects...(ik ik more complicated infrastructure etc. but still lol)
bodsbods9090
Active Member
Looks like I'll be taking a different way home from work in May. That's going to bottleneck big time.
And when they start the overpass at 66 St, forget about it! To work and home will have to be different routes.
And when they start the overpass at 66 St, forget about it! To work and home will have to be different routes.
Edmcowboy11
Senior Member
Although when are they going to start the overpass construction?
bodsbods9090
Active Member
Looks like 2024-2025 is what the city site is saying.
TagYEG
New Member
Looks like a modified option 2 is what has been chosen. The service road on the north side between 107 ST and 126 ST will be 2 way and the eastbound ramp off St. Albert Trail will not merge until after the lights at the 127 ST interchange.
Kaizen
Senior Member
Yellowhead Trail Freeway Conversion Program: Share your input now on St. Albert Trail to 97 Street concept plan.
CplKlinger
Senior Member
The city shared this on Facebook, and I made the mistake of looking at the comments... Both comments are criticizing this project, because the city should "get rid of the traffic lights." What do they think this whole thing is for? Adding more traffic lights??
ChazYEG
Senior Member
NEVER, I repeat, NEVER look at the comments section on Facebook, EVER! It's all disappointment and frustration. Also, if it were up to me, I'd do the same as I always to on Cities Skylines: create a permanent gridlock to force residents to bike, walk and take rail transit, so they should just consider themselves lucky that I'm not in charge of deciding what is done with Edmonton's roads.
The_Cat
Senior Member
Some people are never happy. People complained when West Edmonton Mall opened during the 1980's, as an example how far back this complaining goes. Paraphrasing Oscar Wilde, these people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
CplKlinger
Senior Member
Good point. Speaking of old complaints: Back in the late 1800s, many residents of Edmonton signed a petition demanding that the downriver North West Mounted Police fort - Fort Saskatchewan - be moved upriver to the area where the UofA's north campus now sits. Fort Saskatchewan was just too far away for their liking!
Source
Platinum107
Senior Member
You think the City of Edmonton's page is bad?? Mike Nickel's page is the "Keyboard Warriors Guild" those commenters are sent from
Honestly my strat is just to make transit much more efficient to get to the places where people wanna go lol