johntauren
Active Member
She should be kicked out soon enough.
I can't hear her on livestream, nor does anyone on the stage seem to be reacting.
|
|
|
She should be kicked out soon enough.
I always like reading your posts, Casita, but I have a bone to pick with you. Mrs Chow?"@oliviachow Go after @DougFord2014 ! You're splitting the vote."
https://twitter.com/RosalinKrieger/status/520621089047584768
I bet the last thing FN wants is for Mrs Chow to drop out of the race. So why not play nice with her?
She is not married to a Mr Chow, and women in these days of Women's Liberation from being defined in relation to their husbands, prefer to me called, "Ms."
try this link, the above link didn't work.There is this about judges http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/201...laints_against_judges_challenged_by_star.html
That's okay casita, you and I are both old enough to remember when the title "Ms." didn't exist. It seemed so revolutionary at the time, but so did a lot of things in the 70's.Ooops < embarrassed > I didn't know that, K-G. Thanks! Ms. it is.
That's okay casita, you and I are both old enough to remember when the title "Ms." didn't exist. It seemed so revolutionary at the time, but so did a lot of things in the 70's.
Ari Goldkind is the candidate Olivia Chow should've been.
It manners of etiquette, I defer to Miss Manners. "...the default use of Ms., especially for business purposes, is championed by some etiquette writers, including Judith Martin (a.k.a. "Miss Manners").
"...the honorific "Ms.": Not to have to probe the marital status of ladies with whom one is only doing business. As one doesn't with gentlemen. Please use it."
"How and When To Use "Ms." in Business Correspondence
Plus, how to address an invitation to a same-sex couple."
http://web.archive.org/web/20120315...ationships/article.aspx?cp-documentid=8318992
It manners of etiquette, I defer to Miss Manners. "...the default use of Ms., especially for business purposes, is championed by some etiquette writers, including Judith Martin (a.k.a. "Miss Manners").
"...the honorific "Ms.": Not to have to probe the marital status of ladies with whom one is only doing business. As one doesn't with gentlemen. Please use it."
"How and When To Use "Ms." in Business Correspondence
Plus, how to address an invitation to a same-sex couple."
http://web.archive.org/web/20120315...ationships/article.aspx?cp-documentid=8318992
I didn't see the exchange that prompted this but I'm guessing it has to do with Chow - who goes by her "maiden name" and so should be addressed as Ms. She is not "Mrs. Chow", to call her "Mrs." you'd have to use the surname Leyton, which she has chosen not to do. I always address women as Ms. unless I know that they prefer Mrs. (I hate, HATE the use of "ma'am" - it makes me feel about a million years old and I wish retail staff would be instructed never, ever to use it).
Sadly, in my expereince (based on discussions re: Ford and Chow) the idiot quotient among Chinese Canadians appears to be in line with that of the general population. I was surprised but maybe that was just me being racist.