CplKlinger
Senior Member
I dislike NIMBYs a lot, but I think it's moreso the bad design in that area. It should have been grade-separated. That's why the Metro Line stops at Health Sciences instead of South Campus like it is planned to in the long term; right now, any additional LRT crossings would cause a complete failure at the 114 st/university ave intersection. I guess you could blame NIMBYs partly, since the McKernan and Belgravia communities were very vocal against a tunnel portal being built in their neighbourhood (which was the original plan in the 90s), fearing it would divide them more than an at-grade line. But I think the larger factor was the budget squeeze the city faced, since tunneling is around 2x as expensive IIRC and the Klein years had already set them back by a decade and a half.The train is also delayed at Health science station waiting for traffic light phasing. Blame NIMBYs fo that.
This is my source for most of this comment (the plans for south campus I think I got from the mass transit report); I linked it before but I'll put it here again since it's a very interesting read. I believe there's a similar page for the 2000s, and another for the 2010s.
The History of the Funding of Edmonton's LRT: The 1990s
If Edmonton’s LRT is ever going to charge forward, it might be helpful to look back and see what has pushed it ahead in the past. Here’s the first in a series of po…