ShonTron
Moderator
It's ex BCRail stock used for the Skeena (Totem Class).
Problem is, these are, by and large, Canadian born kids of those that immigrated to Canada from the Caribbean thirty or more years ago that are causing the ruckus. If you're a 17 year old punk causing trouble, you were born in 1992, meaning you're likely a Second Generation Canuck. At what point should we expect this group to grow out of it and to assimilate into the Canadian mosaic? For whatever reason this demographic has found itself stuck in a rut, while our other immigrant groups, from the Chinese and Africans to the South Asians and pretty much everyone else has within one generation, found relative success in Canada.Perhaps this young Black shooting crime thing will pass as they age out of it. Thirty years ago, it was Vietnamnese gangs shooting up Chinatown restaurants. The new supermarket on Dundas just west of Beverly - there used to be restaurants/nightclubs upstairs - there was a machine gunning here of a 'hoodlum' and his girlfriend. I wish I could remember his name - he was notorious and revelled in his reputation.
We've got poor Sikhs, poor Africans, poor Asians, etc, etc. but they're not shooting up the town. So, what's going on here? If it's not family breakdown, what is it?
We could make the minimum sentence drawing and quartering for all these crimes, but it's not going to be a deterrent if people don't think they're going to get caught.
Wouldn't we all resort to violence/crime to get what we want if we thought we could? It would be the 'wild west' again. The thing that stops us, however, is our understanding that crime and violence are simply 'wrong', which is a shared understanding/belief system that is imposed on us culturally by our leaders, community institutions and family etc. My fear in this particular issue is that this is not being done in the community in question: A) because the community is in denial or unwilling to acknowledge the problem to start with. B) because a break-down of the essential family unit. C) because of the aggrandizement of drug use and gangsta culture to fuel a sense of marginalisation and d) rationalizations for bad behavior based on poverty, inequity and racism etc which can tend to muddy the waters
Another attack today on a Greyhound bus. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090127.wbusattack0127/BNStory/National/homeWell, perhaps they should. The odds of being murdered or attacked on a Greyhound bus are not as remote as one might think.
http://edition.cnn.com/2002/US/West/10/01/bus.ax.ap/
A transient was booked on suspicion of murder Tuesday for allegedly slashing the throat of a Greyhound bus driver with a pair of scissors, causing a crash that killed two passengers.
http://www.injuryhelpline.com/index....nd+bus&id=3856
A Dallas-bound Greyhound bus traveling through eastern Arkansas on Interstate 40 careened into marshy woods off of the interstate when an allegedly delusional passenger seized control of the steering wheel from the driver.
http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS/n1554.cfm
Six people were killed and dozens of others injured after a passenger on a Greyhound bus stabbed the bus driver, causing the bus to wreck and flip on Interstate 24
http://www.justachat.com/forum/archi...php/t-356.html
An Atlanta man has been charged with stabbing three people in a fight over the use of a toilet on a Greyhound bus and was being held without bail Monday, police said.
I think we also won't resort to violence because a) we know the consequences, b) we have access to alternative means and c) violence isn't "easy". Why would we use violence when we hold a job, have a life to lose and is likely to get whatever we wanted (consumer level wants) at the end of the day? I think the sense that things can be "better" is missing for these individiuals at a very early age.
AoD